Bangers and cash: Baiting efficiency in a heterogeneous population.
Abstract
O_LIContext: The uptake of baits is a key variable in management actions aimed at the vaccination, training, or control of many vertebrate species. Increasingly, however, it is appreciated that individuals of the target species vary in their likelihood of taking baits. To optimise a baiting program, then, we require knowledge, not only on the rate of bait uptake, and how this changes with bait availability, but also knowledge on the proportion of the target population that will take a bait.\nC_LIO_LIThe invasive cane toad (Rhinella marina) is a major threat to northern quolls (Dasyurus hallucatus), which are poisoned when they attack this novel toxic prey item. Conditioned taste aversion baits (cane toad sausages) can be delivered in the field to train individual northern quolls to avoid toads.\nC_LIO_LIMethods: Here we report on a large-scale field trial across eleven sites across one large property in Western Australia. Camera trapping and statistical modelling was used to estimate the proportion of baitable animals in the population, and the proportion of these that were baited at varying bait availabilities.\nC_LIO_LIResults: Population estimates varied at each site from 3.5 ({+/-}0.76 SD) to 18 ({+/-} 1.58 SD) individual quolls per site, resulting in a range across sites of 0.6-4 baits available per individual. Bait uptake increased with increasing bait availability.\nC_LIO_LIWe also estimate that only 62% of individual quolls are baitable, and that a baiting rate of 3 baits per individual (rather than per area) will result in almost all of these baitable individuals being treated.\nC_LIO_LIWe compared our statistical method with prior data informing the probability of being baitable; and with probability of being baitable set to 1; this resulted in largely differing estimates in relation to an appropriate baiting rate.\nC_LIO_LISynthesis and applications: Data and models such as ours provide wildlife managers with information critical to informed decision making and are fundamental to estimate the cost-efficiency of any baiting campaign.\nC_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Not such silly sausages: Northern quolls exhibit aversion to toads after training with toad sausages.
N. L. Indigo, J. Smith, … B. Phillips·bioRxiv·Aug 26, 2017
- Background food influences rate of encounter and efficacy of rodenticides in wild house mice
Peter R. Brown, Steve Henry, … Wendy A. Ruscoe·Journal of Applied EcologyPeer-reviewed·May 29, 2024
- Accounting for animal movement improves vaccination strategies against wildlife disease in heterogeneous landscapes
K. M. McClure, G. Bastille-Rousseau, … K. M. Pepin·bioRxiv·Oct 15, 2021
- The uptake of attractant and flavour enhanced baits by foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in rural England
G.C. Smith, J.A. Woods·bioRxiv·Jun 8, 2017
- How to count your bugs?
K. S. Onufrieva, A. V. Onufriev·bioRxiv·Feb 8, 2021
- A Smart Bait Dispenser with Real-time Monitoring for Species-Specific Bait Delivery
Pravin R. Chaturvedi, William M. Connelly, … Andrew S. Flies·bioRxiv·Oct 28, 2026