PLoS ONEBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Establishing defined daily doses (DDDs) for antimicrobial agents used for pigs, cattle and poultry in Japan and comparing them with European DDD values
Kyoko Fujimoto, Mai Kawasaki, Reiko Abe, Takashi YokoyamaiD, Takeshi HagaiD, Katsuaki SugiuraiD
Abstract
Monitoring of antimicrobial use is essential to manage the development and selection of antimicrobial resistance. A variety of indicators has become available to monitor antimicrobial use in human and animal medicine. One of them is an indicator based on defined daily dose (DDD). By using the number of DDDs used and normalizing it by the population at risk of being treated in a defined period, one can estimate the number of treatment days with antimicrobial agents in a population. For veterinary medicine, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has published the European values of DDD (DDDvet) for food-producing animals. In this study, we defined Japanese defined daily doses for antimicrobial agents (DDDjp) using DDD values that we previously assigned for antimicrobial products approved for use in pigs, cattle and poultry in Japan and compared them with DDDvet values. For the comparison, the quotient of Japanese and European values (QDDD) was calculated and the effect of the administration route and the number of active substances contained in the preparation was investigated. A total of 59, 51 and 27 DDDjp values were defined for 43, 32 and 25 antimicrobial agents using the data of 269, 195 and 131 products approved for use in pigs, cattle and poultry respectively. A comparison was possible for 44, 27 and 17 pairs of DDDjp and DDDvet values for antimicrobial agents used for pigs, cattle and poultry respectively. The comparison showed median QDDD value of 0.66 and 0.63 for antimicrobial agents used for pigs and cattle respectively (P<0.01), indicating that the Japanese daily doses are significantly lower than the corresponding EMA values in these species. For the antimicrobial agents used for poultry, no siginificant difference was observed between DDDjp and DDDvet values with median QDDD value of 1.17. The difference between DDDvet and DDDjp values and absence of DDDvet values for some antimicrobial agents marketed in Japan indicate that DDDjp rather than DDDvet should be used as the basis for the calculation of antimicrobial use monitoring in farm animals in Japan.
- Citations
- 20
- FWCI
- 2.05
- Field percentile
- top 14%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Measuring antimicrobial use on dairy farms: a longitudinal method comparison study
G. M. Rees, D. C. Barrett, … K. K. Reyher·bioRxiv·Apr 10, 2020
- Reducing antimicrobial usage in small-scale chicken farms in Vietnam: A three-year intervention study
D. H. Phu, N. V. Cuong, … J. Carrique-Mas·bioRxiv·Sep 13, 2020
- Effects of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial uses in small-scale chicken flocks
V. C. Nguyen, T. K. Bach, … M. Choisy·bioRxiv·Jul 2, 2020
- The Swedish example of food animal production without extensive use of antibiotics - or \"healthy animals do not need antibiotics\".
I. Björkman, M. Röing, … C. Stalsby Lundborg·bioRxiv·Oct 17, 2019
- Antibiotic pressures in livestock and meat systems: evidence and interventions for a One Health future
Yi Lu, Hongyue Ma·bioRxiv·Sep 3, 2025
- Withdraw of prophylactic antimicrobials does not change the pigs’ resistome