Towards More Realistic Simulated Datasets for Benchmarking Deep Learning Models in Regulatory Genomics
Abstract
Deep neural networks and support vector machines have been shown to accurately predict genome-wide signals of regulatory activity from raw DNA sequences. These models are appealing in part because they can learn predictive DNA sequence features without prior assumptions. Several methods such as in-silico mutagenesis, GradCAM, DeepLIFT, Integrated Gradients and Gkm-Explain have been developed to reveal these learned features. However, the behavior of these methods on regulatory genomic data remains an area of active research. Although prior work has benchmarked these methods on simulated datasets with known ground-truth motifs, these simulations employed highly simplified regulatory logic that is not representative of the genome. In this work, we propose a novel pipeline for designing simulated data that comes closer to modeling the complexity of regulatory genomic DNA. We apply the pipeline to build simulated datasets based on publicly-available chromatin accessibility experiments and use these datasets to bench-mark different interpretation methods based on their ability to identify ground-truth motifs. We find that a GradCAM-based method, which was reported to perform well on a more simplified dataset, does not do well on this dataset (particularly when using an architecture with shorter convolutional kernels in the first layer), and we theoretically show that this is expected based on the nature of regulatory genomic data. We also show that Integrated Gradients sometimes performs worse than gradient-times-input, likely owing to its linear interpolation path. We additionally explore the impact of user-defined settings on the interpretation methods, such as the choice of "reference"/"baseline", and identify recommended settings for genomics. Our analysis suggests several promising directions for future research on these model interpretation methods. Code and links to data are available at https://github.com/kundajelab/interpret-benchmark.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 15
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Robust Neural Networks are More Interpretable for Genomics
Peter K. Koo, Sharon Qian, … Dimitris Kalimeris·bioRxiv·Jun 3, 2019
- seqgra: Principled Selection of Neural Network Architectures for Genomics Prediction Tasks
Konstantin Krismer, Jennifer Hammelman, David Kenneth Gifford·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 18, 2022
- Motif Interactions Affect Post-Hoc Interpretability of Genomic Convolutional Neural Networks
Marta Lemanczyk, Jakub M. Bartoszewicz, Bernhard Y. Renard·bioRxiv·Feb 15, 2024
- Assessing deep learning algorithms in cis-regulatory motif finding based on genomic sequencing data
Yan Wang, Shuangquan Zhang, … Qin Ma·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 8, 2021
- The impact of different negative training data on regulatory sequence predictions
Louisa-Marie Krützfeldt, Max Schubach, Martin Kircher·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2020
- Discovering epistatic feature interactions from neural network models of regulatory DNA sequences
Peyton Greenside, Tyler C. Shimko, … Anshul Bharat Kundaje·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 7, 2018