Accounting for epistasis improves genomic prediction of phenotypes with univariate and bivariate models across environments
Elaheh VojganiiD, Torsten PookiD, Johannes W. R. MartiniiD, Armin C. HölkeriD, Manfred MayeriD, Chris‐Carolin SchöniD, Henner SimianeriD
Abstract
We compared the predictive ability of various prediction models for a maize dataset derived from 910 doubled haploid lines from European landraces (Kemater Landmais Gelb and Petkuser Ferdinand Rot), which were tested in six locations in Germany and Spain. The compared models were Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP) as an additive model, Epistatic Random Regression BLUP (ERRBLUP) accounting for all pairwise SNP interactions, and selective Epistatic Random Regression BLUP (sERRBLUP) accounting for a selected subset of pairwise SNP interactions. These models have been compared in both univariate and bivariate statistical settings within and across environments. Our results indicate that modeling all pairwise SNP interactions into the univariate/bivariate model (ERRBLUP) is not superior in predictive ability to the respective additive model (GBLUP). However, incorporating only a selected subset of interactions with the highest effect variances in univariate/bivariate sERRBLUP can increase predictive ability significantly compared to the univariate/bivariate GBLUP. Overall, bivariate models consistently outperform univariate models in predictive ability. Over all studied traits, locations, and landraces, the increase in prediction accuracy from univariate GBLUP to univariate sERRBLUP ranged from 5.9 to 112.4 percent, with an average increase of 47 percent. For bivariate models, the change ranged from -0.3 to +27.9 percent comparing the bivariate sERRBLUP to the bivariate GBLUP. The average increase across traits and locations was 11 percent. This considerable increase in predictive ability achieved by sERRBLUP may be of interest for "sparse testing" approaches in which only a subset of the lines/hybrids of interest is observed at each location. Key MessageThe prediction accuracy of genomic prediction of phenotypes can be increased by only including top ranked pairwise SNP interactions into the prediction models.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 29
- FWCI
- 2.26
- Field percentile
- top 11%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Bivariate genomic prediction of phenotypes by selecting epistatic interactions across years
Elaheh Vojgani, Torsten Pook, … Henner Simianer·bioRxiv·Nov 18, 2020
- Using machine learning to integrate genetic and environmental data to model genotype-by-environment interactions
Igor Kuivjogi Fernandes, Caio Canella Vieira, … Samuel B. Fernandes·bioRxiv·Feb 8, 2024
- Multifactorial Methods Integrating Haplotype and Epistasis Effects for Genomic Estimation and Prediction of Quantitative Traits
Yang Da, Zuoxiang Liang, Dzianis Prakapenka·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 14, 2022
- Ensemble of BLUP, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning Models Predict Maize Yield Better Than Each Model Alone.
D. R. Kick, J. D. Washburn·bioRxiv·Mar 30, 2023
- The impact of epistasis on the genomic prediction of non-assessed and non-overlapping single crosses in multi-environment trials
José Marcelo Soriano Viana, Jean Paulo Aparecido da Silva·bioRxiv·Feb 21, 2025
- Integration of Dominance and Marker x Environment Interactions into Maize Genomic Prediction Models
Luís Felipe V. Ferrão, Caillet Dornelles Marinho, … Márcio F. R. Resende·bioRxiv·Jul 4, 2018