Briefings in BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Capturing large genomic contexts for accurately predicting enhancer-promoter interactions
Abstract
Accurately identifying enhancer-promoter interactions (EPIs) is challenging because enhancers usually act on the promoters of distant target genes. Although a variety of machine learning and deep learning models have been developed, many of them are not designed to or could not be well applied to predict EPIs in cell types different from the training data. In this study, we develop the TransEPI model for EPI prediction based on datasets derived from Hi-C and ChIA-PET data. TransEPI compiles genomic features from large intervals harboring the enhancer-promoter pair and adopts a Transformer-based architecture to capture the long-range dependencies. Thus, TransEPI could achieve more accurate prediction by addressing the impact of other genomic loci that may competitively interact with the enhancer-promoter pair. We evaluate TransEPI in a challenging scenario, where the independent test samples are predicted by models trained on the data from different cell types and chromosomes. TransEPI robustly predicts cross-cell-type EPI prediction by achieving comparable performance in cross-validation and independent test. More importantly, TransEPI significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art EPI models on the independent test datasets, with the Area Under Precision-Recall Curve (auPRC) score increasing by 48.84 % on average. Hence, TransEPI is applicable for accurate EPI prediction in cell types without chromatin structure data. Moreover, we find the TransEPI framework could also be extended to identify the target gene of non-coding mutations, which may facilitate studying pathogenic non-coding mutations.
- assay: Hi-C
- assay: ChIP-seq
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: deep learning
- approach: transformer / foundation model
- Citations
- 33
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Field percentile
- top 13%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The perils of interaction prediction
Weiguang Mao, Dennis Kostka, Maria D. Chikina·bioRxiv·Oct 5, 2018
- UniversalEPI: robust prediction of cell type-specific and differential chromatin interactions from DNA sequence and chromatin accessibility
Aayush Grover, Lin Zhang, … Valentina Boeva·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·May 5, 2026
- Modeling Enhancer-Promoter Interactions with Attention-Based Neural Networks
Weiguang Mao, Dennis Kostka, Maria D. Chikina·bioRxiv·Nov 14, 2017
- Local epigenomic state cannot discriminate interacting and non-interacting enhancer-promoter pairs with high accuracy
Xi Wang, M Beer·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 18, 2018
- Predicting Enhancer-Promoter Interaction from Genomic Sequence with Deep Neural Networks
Shashank Kumar Singh, Yang Yang, … Jian Ma·Quantitative BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 25, 2019
- Predicting unrecognized enhancer-mediated genome topology by an ensemble machine learning model
Li Tang, Matthew C. Hill, … Min Li·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2020