bioRxivNeuroscience
Probing machine-learning classifiers using noise, bubbles, and reverse correlation
Etienne ThoretiD, Thomas AndrilloniD, Damien LégeriD, Daniel PressnitzeriD
Abstract
BackgroundMany scientific fields now use machine-learning tools to assist with complex classification tasks. In neuroscience, automatic classifiers may be useful to diagnose medical images, monitor electrophysiological signals, or decode perceptual and cognitive states from neural signals. However, such tools often remain black-boxes: they lack interpretability. A lack of interpretability has obvious ethical implications for clinical applications, but it also limits the usefulness of these tools to formulate new theoretical hypotheses. New methodWe propose a simple and versatile method to help characterize the information used by a classifier to perform its task. Specifically, noisy versions of training samples or, when the training set is unavailable, custom-generated noisy samples, are fed to the classifier. Multiplicative noise, so-called "bubbles", or additive noise are applied to the input representation. Reverse correlation techniques are then adapted to extract either the discriminative information, defined as the parts of the input dataset that have the most weight in the classification decision, and represented information, which correspond to the input features most representative of each category. ResultsThe method is illustrated for the classification of written numbers by a convolutional deep neural network; for the classification of speech versus music by a support vector machine; and for the classification of sleep stages from neurophysiological recordings by a random forest classifier. In all cases, the features extracted are readily interpretable. Comparison with Existing MethodsQuantitative comparisons show that the present method can match state-of-the art interpretation methods for convolutional neural networks. Moreover, our method uses an intuitive and well-established framework in neuroscience, reverse correlation. It is also generic: it can be applied to any kind of classifier and any kind of input data. ConclusionsWe suggest that the method could provide an intuitive and versatile interface between neuroscientists and machine-learning tools. HighlightsO_LIThe heuristics of black-box classifiers can be probed with noisy inputs C_LIO_LIThe relevant features can be visualised in the input representation space C_LIO_LIThe method applies to any kind of data such as 2D images or 1D time series C_LIO_LIIt applies to any classifier such as deep neural networks, support vector machines, random forests C_LI
- Citations
- 15
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Field percentile
- top 22%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Modern Machine Learning: Partition & Vote
Carey E. Priebe, Joshua T Vogelstein, … Christopher M. White·bioRxiv·Apr 29, 2020
- Reproducibility of importance extraction methods in neural network based fMRI classification
Athanasios Gotsopoulos, Heini Saarimäki, … Jouko Lampinen·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 30, 2018
- A Novel Activation Maximization-based Approach for Insight into Electrophysiology Classifiers
Charles A. Ellis, Mohammad S.E. Sendi, … Vince D. Calhoun·IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)Peer-reviewed·Dec 9, 2021
- A Gradient-based Spectral Explainability Method for EEG Deep Learning Classifiers
Charles A. Ellis, Mohammad S.E. Sendi, … Vince D. Calhoun·bioRxiv·Jul 14, 2021
- A Model Visualization-based Approach for Insight into Waveforms and Spectra Learned by CNNs
Charles A. Ellis, Robyn L. Miller, Vince D. Calhoun·Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)Peer-reviewed·Jul 11, 2022
- ClassificaIO: machine learning for classification graphical user interface
Raeuf Roushangar, George I. Mias·bioRxiv·Oct 25, 2018