Sign in
NeuroscienceScientific Reports
Peer-reviewed journal article

Sensorimotor functional connectivity in unilateral cerebral palsy: influence of corticospinal tract wiring pattern and clinical correlates

Cristina Simón-MartíneziD, Ellen JaspersiD, Kaat AlaertsiD, Els OrtibusiD, Joshua Henk BalstersiD, Lisa MailleuxiD, Jeroen BlommaertiD, Charlotte SleursiD, Katrijn KlingelsiD, Frédéric C. AmantiD, Anne UyttebroeckiD, Nicole WenderothiD, Hilde FeysiD

Abstract

In children with unilateral cerebral palsy (uCP), the corticospinal tract (CST) wiring patterns may differ (contralateral, ipsilateral or bilateral), partially determining motor deficits. However, the impact of such CST wiring on functional connectivity remains unknown. Here, we explored differences in functional connectivity of the resting-state sensorimotor network in 26 uCP with periventricular white matter lesions (mean age (SD): 12.87m (4.5), CST wiring: 9 contralateral, 9 ipsilateral, 6 bilateral) compared to 60 healthy controls (mean age (SD): 14.54 (4.8)), and between CST wiring patterns. Functional connectivity from each M1 to three bilateral sensorimotor regions of interest (primary sensory cortex, dorsal and ventral premotor cortex) and the supplementary motor area was compared between groups (healthy controls vs. uCP; and healthy controls vs. each CST wiring group). Results from the seed-to-voxel analyses from bilateral M1 were compared between groups. Additionally, relations with upper limb motor deficits were explored. Aberrant sensorimotor functional connectivity seemed to be CST-dependent rather than specific from all the uCP population: in the dominant hemisphere, the contralateral CST group showed increased connectivity between M1 and premotor cortices, whereas the bilateral CST group showed higher connectivity between M1 and somatosensory association areas. These results suggest that functional connectivity of the sensorimotor network is CST wiring-dependent, although the impact on upper limb function remains unclear.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
24
FWCI
2.78
Field percentile
top 10%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISRobert '19Khan '26Taga '24Braaß '23Ermolova '25Gassass '26
73% semantic matchNeuroscience
Maxime T. Robert, Jennifer Gutterman, Claudio L. Ferre+4 more·bioRxiv·Apr 17, 2019· 1 citations