Crops under continuous cultivation exhibit less plasticity than those under interrupted cultivation
Ganesh AlagarasaniD, Rajeev Kumar VarshneyiD, Eswarayya RamireddyiD
Abstract
Evolutionary studies indicate that species in stable environments often evolve with reduced plasticity, whereas those in variable environments tend to maintain higher plasticity to adapt to changing conditions. Our study explores whether this evolutionary principle extends to cultivated crops. In crop science, phenotypic plasticity is generally understood as a short-term response to environmental factors. Yet, the long-term evolutionary changes in both plastic and non-plastic traits under different cultivation regimes remain largely unexamined. Herein, we developed a novel mechanistic crop growth model, collectively termed the Trait-Environment Fitness Interaction (TEFI) Model, to study if and how trait plasticity varies among crops under different cultivation regimes. Our results, based on the TEFI Model, show higher trade-offs between fitness and plasticity. Specifically, we observed the evolution of higher plasticity in crops subjected to intermittent cultivation, which experienced more variable environments. However, this higher plasticity does not compensate for fitness losses due to the high rate of environmental unpredictability. Conversely, species under relatively stable conditions tend to evolve with reduced plasticity. Using real-world crop datasets, we validated the theoretical predictions of the TEFI Model, which suggest that the longer the interruption, the higher the plasticity. Our results highlight the evolutionary impact of cultivation patterns on trait plasticity and its importance in crop fitness. Ultimately, our findings illustrate how evolutionary principles of plasticity, as captured by the TEFI Model, can inform sustainable crop improvement strategies.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- High plasticity increases phenotype-environment mismatch leading to sub-optimal performance in underutilized crop species
Ganesh Alagarasan, Pieter A. Arnold, Eswarayya Ramireddy·bioRxiv·Nov 14, 2024
- Phenotypic plasticity affects species packing in seasonally fluctuating environments
David M. Anderson, Rachel B. Potter, Colin T. Kremer·bioRxiv·Sep 28, 2026
- The effects of phenotypic plasticity on diversification rates and adaptive evolution in simulated environments with different climatic and cost contexts
Emerson Campos Barbosa Júnior, Pavel Dodonov, … Bruno Vilela·Ecological ModellingPeer-reviewed·Dec 9, 2024
- Phenotypic plasticity evolved for climate variability constrains performance under climate warming
Joie R. Beasley‐Bennett, Michelle Zavala‐Paez, … Jill A. Hamilton·bioRxiv·Mar 20, 2026
- Distinct genetic architecture for trait mean and plasticity in chickpea
Ganesh Alagarasan, Rajeev Kumar Varshney, Eswarayya Ramireddy·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2024
- Climate variability and the paradox of plasticity
Alex R. Gunderson, Michael L. Logan, Guillermo Garcia‐Costoya·bioRxiv·Aug 27, 2026