Forest canopy cover composition and landscape influence over bryophytes communities in Nothofagus forests of southern Patagonia
M. D. Toro Manriquez, V. Ardiles, A. Promis, A. Huertas Herrera, R. Soler, M. V. Lencinas, G. Martinez Pastur
Abstract
Understanding the influence environmental drivers on understory vegetation is important for conservation efforts under climate change. Bryophytes are one of the most diverse groups in temperate forests but also the least known. In addition, the environmental drivers (e.g., forest structure, microclimate, soil conditions or substrate) influencing over bryophyte community among Nothofagus forest types are poorly known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of forest canopy-layer composition on the structure (cover) and the composition (richness and diversity) of bryophyte communities (mosses and liverworts) in two contrast landscape types (coast and mountain) in southern Patagonia. Three natural Nothofagus forest types (pure deciduous, pure evergreen, and mixed deciduous-evergreen) in two landscapes (coast 400 m.a.s.l.) were selected (N = 60 plots). In each forest plot, we established one linear transect (10 m length) to measure bryophyte cover (point-intercept method). The data were evaluated using ANOVAs, Chi-square test and multivariate analyses. The mosses were mostly austral-antarctic origin, and the liverworts were all endemics. The principal substrates for the bryophytes development in the forest floor were litter and decaying woods. Moreover, many bryophytes species act as a substrate for natural tree regeneration. The forest structure was the main driver of bryophytes community in the coast landscape, while the slope was the principal driver of bryophytes in the mountain landscape. These differences were mainly explained for the microclimate into the forests (e.g., soil moisture and air temperature), and for the regional climate in the landscapes (e.g., air temperature and soil conditions). Notably, the mixed forest, mainly in the coast, presented exclusive species that were not present in the deciduous and evergreen pure forests. The conservation efforts should include management considerations both the stand and landscape levels based on the potential climate-change impact over bryophyte communities.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Epiphytic cryptogam communities differ little despite strong variation in coastal fog exposure
Abbey K. Schedler, Katrina McCollough, … Jenna T. B. Ekwealor·bioRxiv·Oct 19, 2026
- Aridity and coexistence with vascular plants determine the dynamics of coastal dune bryophyte communities
Zulema Varela, Sérgio Chozas, … Joaquín Hortal·Biodiversity and ConservationPeer-reviewed·Jun 21, 2025
- Consolidating the knowledge of the Caatinga's bryophytes: a comprehensive synthesis with new records
Jhonyd Jhonata de Oliveira Marmo, Jailton Venilson Ferreira da Silva, … Mércia Patrícia Pereira Silva·bioRxiv·Dec 23, 2025
- Do forest over- and understory respond to the same environmental variables when viewed at the taxonomic and trait level?
K. Helsen, Y.-C. Shen, … D. Zeleny·bioRxiv·Sep 6, 2021
- Drivers of grass endophyte communities in prairies of the Pacific Northwest, USA
- Bark traits affect epiphytic bryophyte community assembly in a temperate forest
S. Tatsumi, T. Ohgue, … K. Nishizawa·bioRxiv·Jul 12, 2023