bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Towards CNN Representations for Small Mass Spectrometry Data Classification: From Transfer Learning to Cumulative Learning
Khawla Seddiki, Philippe SaudemontiD, Fŕed́eric PreciosoiD, Nina OgrinciD, Maxence WisztorskiiD, Michel SalzetiD, Isabelle FournieriD, Arnaud DroitiD
Abstract
Rapid and accurate clinical diagnosis of pathological conditions remains highly challenging. A very important component of diagnosis tool development is the design of effective classification models with Mass spectrometry (MS) data. Some popular Machine Learning (ML) approaches have been investigated for this purpose but these ML models require time-consuming preprocessing steps such as baseline correction, denoising, and spectrum alignment to remove non-sample-related data artifacts. They also depend on the tedious extraction of handcrafted features, making them unsuitable for rapid analysis. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have been found to perform well under such circumstances since they can learn efficient representations from raw data without the need for costly preprocessing. However, their effectiveness drastically decreases when the number of available training samples is small, which is a common situation in medical applications. Transfer learning strategies extend an accurate representation model learnt usually on a large dataset containing many categories, to a smaller dataset with far fewer categories. In this study, we first investigate transfer learning on a 1D-CNN we have designed to classify MS data, then we develop a new representation learning method when transfer learning is not powerful enough, as in cases of low-resolution or data heterogeneity. What we propose is to train the same model through several classification tasks over various small datasets in order to accumulate generic knowledge of what MS data are, in the resulting representation. By using rat brain data as the initial training dataset, a representation learning approach can have a classification accuracy exceeding 98% for canine sarcoma cancer cells, human ovarian cancer serums, and pathogenic microorganism biotypes in 1D clinical datasets. We show for the first time the use of cumulative representation learning using datasets generated in different biological contexts, on different organisms, in different mass ranges, with different MS ionization sources, and acquired by different instruments at different resolutions. Our approach thus proposes a promising strategy for improving MS data classification accuracy when only small numbers of samples are available as a prospective cohort. The principles demonstrated in this work could even be beneficial to other domains (astronomy, archaeology...) where training samples are scarce.
- organism: rat
- organism: human
- organism: multiple species
- assay: metagenomics
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: deep learning
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 5
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- MSMCE: A Novel Representation Module for Classification of Raw Mass Spectrometry Data
Fengyi Zhang, Boyong Gao, … Xingchuang Xiong·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Aug 6, 2025
- massNet: integrated processing and classification of spatially resolved mass spectrometry data using deep learning for rapid tumor delineation
Walid M. Abdelmoula, Sylwia A. Stopka, … Nathalie Y.R. Agar·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 13, 2022
- Convolutional Neural Networks for Classifying Melanoma Images
- Deep Learning and Transfer Learning for Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
Faris Rustom, Ezekiel Moroze, … Arash Yazdanbakhsh·Biology Methods and ProtocolsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- Transfer Learning From Nucleus Detection To Classification In Histopathology Images
Safoora Yousefi, Yao Nie·IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)Peer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2019
- Variance Analysis of LC-MS Experimental Factors and Their Impact on Machine Learning
Tobias Greisager Rehfeldt, Konrad Krawczyk, … Veit Schwämmle·bioRxiv·May 1, 2023