bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Auto-STEED: A data mining tool for automated extraction of experimental parameters and risk of bias items from in vivo publications
Wolfgang Emanuel ZürreriD, Amelia Elaine Cannon, Ewoud EwingiD, Marianna RossoiD, Daniel S. ReichiD, Benjamin Victor IneicheniD
Abstract
BackgroundSystematic reviews, i.e., research summaries that address focused questions in a structured and reproducible manner, are a cornerstone of evidence-based medicine and research. However, certain systematic review steps such as data extraction are labour-intensive which hampers their applicability, not least with the rapidly expanding body of biomedical literature. ObjectiveTo bridge this gap, we aimed at developing a data mining tool in the R programming environment to automate data extraction from neuroscience in vivo publications. The function was trained on a literature corpus (n=45 publications) of animal motor neuron disease studies and tested in two validation corpora (motor neuron diseases, n=31 publications; multiple sclerosis, n=244 publications). ResultsOur data mining tool Auto-STEED (Automated and STructured Extraction of Experimental Data) was able to extract key experimental parameters such as animal models and species as well as risk of bias items such as randomization or blinding from in vivo studies. Sensitivity and specificity were over 85 and 80%, respectively, for most items in both validation corpora. Accuracy and F-scores were above 90% and 0.9 for most items in the validation corpora. Time savings were above 99%. ConclusionsOur developed text mining tool Auto-STEED is able to extract key experimental parameters and risk of bias items from the neuroscience in vivo literature. With this, the tool can be deployed to probe a field in a research improvement context or to replace one human reader during data extraction resulting in substantial time-savings and contribute towards automation of systematic reviews. The function is available on Github.
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The PDF Data Extractor (PDE) Pre-screening Tool Reduced the Manual Review Burden for Systematic Literature Reviews by Over 35% Through Automated High-Throughput Assessment of Full-Text Articles
E. Stricker, M. E. Scheurer·bioRxiv·Jul 13, 2021
- Mining the neuroimaging literature
Jérôme Dockès, Kendra Oudyk, … Jean‐Baptiste Poline·eLifePeer-reviewed·Sep 11, 2025
- Risk of Bias Assessment in Preclinical Literature using Natural Language Processing
Qianying Wang, Jing Liao, … Malcolm Robert Macleod·Research Synthesis MethodsPeer-reviewed·Oct 28, 2021
- Extracting the Research Goal from Biomedical Abstracts
Mariana Neves, Ines Schadock, … Bettina Bert·bioRxiv·Sep 19, 2025
- Automation of citation screening in pre-clinical systematic reviews
Jing Liao, Sophia Ananiadou, … Malcolm Robert Macleod·bioRxiv·Jan 9, 2020
- Reliable extraction of clinical-trial evidence with provenance, verification, and targeted review
Gaurav Najpande, Prasham Titiya, … Vivek Gupta·bioRxiv·Oct 8, 2026