Neuroscience & Biobehavioral ReviewsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Does Unfairness Evoke Anger or Disgust? A Quantitative Neurofunctional Dissection Based on 25 Years of Neuroimaging
Xianyang GaniD, Ran ZhangiD, Zihao ZhengiD, Lan Wang, Xi YangiD, Benjamin Klugah‐BrowniD, Ting XuiD, Nan QiuiD, Keith Maurice KendrickiD, Klaus MathiakiD, Justin Tiwald, Dezhong YaoiD, Benjamin BeckeriD
Abstract
Over the last decades, the traditional Homo economicus model has been increasingly challenged by convergent evidence underscoring the impact of emotions on decision-making. A classic example is the perception of unfairness operationalized in the Ultimatum Game where humans readily sacrifice personal gains to punish those who violate fairness norms. While the emotional mechanism underlying costly punishments has been widely acknowledged, the distinct contributions of moral emotions (anger or disgust) remain debated, partly due to methodological limitations of the conventional experiments. Here, we capitalize on a quantitative neurofunctional dissection approach by combining recent developments in neuroimaging meta-analyses, behavioral-level, network-level, and neurochemical-level decoding and data from 3,266 participants from functional neuroimaging studies to determine the common and distinct neural representations between unfairness and the two moral emotions. Experience of unfairness engaged a widespread bilateral network encompassing insular, cingulate, and frontal regions, with dorsal striatal regions mediating the decision to reject unfair offers. Disgust engaged a defensive-avoidance circuit encompassing amygdalar, occipital, and frontal regions, while anger engaged non-overlapping systems including mid-cingulate, thalamic, and frontal regions. Unfairness and anger or disgust respectively commonly engaged the anterior and mid-insula, while the latter additionally showed common recruitment of ventrolateral prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortices. Multimodal network, behavioral, and serotonergic decoding provided a more granular and convincing dissection of these results. Findings indicate a shared neuroaffective basis underlying the impact of emotions on unfairness-induced punishment behavior and suggest a common brain circuit has been evolutionarily shaped to protect individuals from personal harm and enforce societal norms.
- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 0.66
- Field percentile
- top 39%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Distinct neural computations scale the violation of expected reward and emotion in social transgressions
Ting Xu, Lei Zhang, … Benjamin Becker·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 21, 2025
- Differences in other-directed emotion regulation tracks connectivity between amygdala and prefrontal regions during fairness decisions
Melanie C. Kos, Yi Yang, … David V Smith·bioRxiv·May 18, 2026
- Betrayal and unfairness are linked through insula-valuation network dynamics
Jacob M. Stanley, Derrick Dwamena, … David Victor Smith·bioRxiv·Nov 20, 2025
- Spatial gradient in activity within the insula reflects dissociable neural mechanisms underlying context-dependent advantageous and disadvantageous inequity aversion
Xiaoxue Gao, Hongbo Yu, … Xiaolin Zhou·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jul 30, 2018
- Common and distinct neurofunctional representations of core and social disgust in the brain: Coordinate-based and network meta-analyses
Xianyang Gan, Xinqi Zhou, … Benjamin Becker·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral ReviewsPeer-reviewed·Feb 2, 2022
- Morality recruits neural reward circuitry to shape economic decision making
Jie Liu, Xiaoxuan Huang, … Fang Cui·bioRxiv·Jan 27, 2020