bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Explaining decision biases through context-dependent repetition
Abstract
Humans are prone to decision biases, which make behavior seemingly irrational. An important cause for decision biases is that the context in which decisions are made can later influence which choices humans prefer in new situations. Current computational models often require extensive environmental knowledge to explain these biases. Here, we tested the hypothesis that decision biases are mainly driven by a tendency to repeat context-specific actions. We implemented a series of nine value-based decision experiments on n = 351 male and female participants and reanalyzed six previously published datasets (n=350 participants). We found that higher within-context repetition of an option was associated with biased choices including higher subjective valuation and lower uncertainty for repeated actions. Next, we used a computational model based on two basic principles, learning by reward and decision repetition and tested it on all datasets. Our results show that the combination of these two basic principles is sufficient to explain biased choices. We demonstrate via hierarchical Bayesian model comparison that our model outperforms all alternative models. These results provide novel insights into human choice behavior and offer a solution to difficulties in current explanations and models. Significance StatementHuman decision-making often deviates from rational choice theory. Understanding how decision biases emerge is essential for interpreting real-world human behavior. Our study shows how repeating decisions shapes decision making in novel situations. We adapt a simple computational model that can explain decision biases based on reward learning and decision repetition. By testing the model across 15 datasets, we demonstrate that it outperforms previous models, also offering new insights into how preferences affect subjective valuation and uncertainty. In sum, these findings provide a deeper understanding of how context-dependent preferences for specific decisions emerge and persist.
- Citations
- 2
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Cognitive Computational Model Reveals Repetition Bias in a Sequential Decision-Making Task
Eric Legler, Darío Cuevas Rivera, … Stefan J. Kiebel·Communications PsychologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 13, 2025
- Reminders of past choices bias decisions for reward in humans.
Aaron M. Bornstein, Mel Win Khaw, … Nathaniel D. Daw·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jun 27, 2017
- Opposite effects of choice history and stimulus history resolve a paradox of sequential choice bias
Ella Bosch, Matthias Fritsche, … Floris P. de Lange·Journal of VisionPeer-reviewed·Nov 19, 2020
- Response outcomes gate the impact of expectations on perceptual decisions
Ainhoa Hermoso-Mendizabal, Alexandre Hyafil, … Jaime de la Rocha·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Feb 26, 2020
- Adaptive History Biases Result from Confidence-weighted Accumulation of Past Choices
Anke Braun, Anne E Urai, Tobias H. Donner·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 25, 2018
- Choice history biases subsequent evidence accumulation
Anne E Urai, Jan Willem de Gee, … Tobias H. Donner·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jul 2, 2019