Sign in
NeuroscienceNature Communications
Peer-reviewed journal article

Error-correcting dynamics in visual working memory

Matthew F. PanichelloiD, Brian DePasqualeiD, Jonathan W. PillowiD, Timothy J. BuschmaniD

Abstract

Working memory is critical to cognition, decoupling behavior from the immediate world. Yet, it is imperfect; internal noise introduces errors into memory representations (1, 2). Such errors accumulate over time (3-5) and increase with the number of items simultaneously held in working memory (6-10). Here, we show that error-correcting attractor dynamics mitigate the impact of noise on working memory. These dynamics pull memories towards a few stable representations in mnemonic space, inducing a bias in memory representations but reducing the effect of noise. Model-based and model-free analyses show attractor dynamics account for the frequency, bias, and precision of working memory reports in both humans and monkeys. Furthermore, attractor dynamics were optimized to the context; they adapted to the statistics of the environment, such that memories drifted towards contextually-predicted values. Our results suggest attractor dynamics mediate errors in working memory by counteracting noise and integrating contextual information into memories.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
144
FWCI
6.97
Field percentile
top 2%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISKular '26Gu '25Honig '20Четвериков '26Yang '23Lim '18
75% semantic matchNeuroscience
Holly Kular, John T. Serences·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review·Aug 1, 2026· 1 citations