Error-correcting dynamics in visual working memory
Matthew F. PanichelloiD, Brian DePasqualeiD, Jonathan W. PillowiD, Timothy J. BuschmaniD
Abstract
Working memory is critical to cognition, decoupling behavior from the immediate world. Yet, it is imperfect; internal noise introduces errors into memory representations (1, 2). Such errors accumulate over time (3-5) and increase with the number of items simultaneously held in working memory (6-10). Here, we show that error-correcting attractor dynamics mitigate the impact of noise on working memory. These dynamics pull memories towards a few stable representations in mnemonic space, inducing a bias in memory representations but reducing the effect of noise. Model-based and model-free analyses show attractor dynamics account for the frequency, bias, and precision of working memory reports in both humans and monkeys. Furthermore, attractor dynamics were optimized to the context; they adapted to the statistics of the environment, such that memories drifted towards contextually-predicted values. Our results suggest attractor dynamics mediate errors in working memory by counteracting noise and integrating contextual information into memories.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 144
- FWCI
- 6.97
- Field percentile
- top 2%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Memory recall errors reflect interacting sensory and mnemonic representations
Holly Kular, John T. Serences·Psychonomic Bulletin & ReviewPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2026
- Attractor dynamics of working memory explain a concurrent evolution of stimulus-specific and decision-consistent biases in visual estimation
Hyunwoo Gu, Joonwon Lee, … Sang‐Hun Lee·NeuronPeer-reviewed·Jul 29, 2025
- Humans incorporate trial-to-trial working memory uncertainty into rewarded decisions
Maija Honig, Wei Ji Ma, Daryl Lawrence Fougnie·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Mar 30, 2020
- Noise in Competing Representations Determines the Direction of Memory Biases
Андрей Анатольевич Четвериков, Sabrina Hansmann-Roth·bioRxiv·Jan 27, 2026
- Sensory-memory interactions via modular structure explain errors in visual working memory
Jun Yang, Hanqi Zhang, Sukbin Lim·bioRxiv·Nov 9, 2023
- Not-so-working memory: Drift in fMRI pattern representations during maintenance predicts errors in a visual working memory task
Phui Cheng Lim, Emily J Ward, … Matthew R. Johnson·Journal of VisionPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2018