bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
The cerebellum specializes for language even in the absence of contralateral neocortical inputs
Bangjie WangiD, Greta TuckuteiD, Hope KeaniD, Salomi S. AsaridouiD, Susan Goldin-meadow AiD, Susan Cohen LevineiD, Evelina G. FedorenkoiD, Anila M. D’MelloiD
Abstract
Long considered a structure dedicated primarily to motor control, the cerebellum is now known to contain regions that respond selectively to language. However, how cerebellar language specialization emerges during development remains unknown. The prevailing proposal is that cerebellar functional specialization critically depends on inputs from the contralateral neocortex, received through well-established reciprocal cortico-cerebellar connections. Here, we test this proposal in two individuals with atypical brain development: EG, a right-handed woman who lacks most of her left temporal lobe (presumably from birth) and whose neocortical language network resides in her right hemisphere, and C1, an individual missing the entire left cerebral hemisphere from birth. Using precision functional MRI in EG and a cohort of 74 typically-developing adults, we find that EG's cerebellar language network shows a strong left-hemispheric bias, mirroring the atypical lateralization of language in her cerebral cortex, while preserving canonical topography and response profiles of the language-dominant cerebellar regions. Critically, however, EG's right cerebellar hemisphere also responds to language and even contains a language-selective region despite the absence of language regions in the neocortical left hemisphere. We replicate these cerebellar findings in C1, a more extreme case who is missing the entire left hemisphere. These results show that the cerebellum develops language sensitivity despite the absence of contralateral inputs in the face of early injury. Together, these findings challenge the view that cerebellar specialization critically requires contralateral neocortical inputs, and point instead to some degree of intrinsic neocortex-independent cerebellar organization.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The cerebellar components of the human language network
Colton Casto, Moshe Poliak, … Evelina G. Fedorenko·NeuronPeer-reviewed·Jan 22, 2026
- Language and the cerebellum: structural connectivity to the eloquent brain
Katie R. Jobson, Linda J. Hoffman, … Ingrid R. Olson·Neurobiology of LanguagePeer-reviewed·Oct 20, 2022
- Frontal language areas do not emerge in the absence of temporal language areas: A case study of an individual born without a left temporal lobe
Greta Tuckute, Alexander M. Paunov, … Evelina G. Fedorenko·bioRxiv·May 28, 2021
- Voxelwise encoding models show that cerebellar language representations are highly conceptual
Amanda LeBel, Shailee Jain, Alexander G. Huth·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 3, 2021
- Cerebellar growth is associated with domain-specific cerebral maturation and socio-linguistic behavioral outcomes
Aikaterina Manoli, Neville Magielse, … Sofie Louise Valk·bioRxiv·Sep 11, 2025
- Cerebellar influences on neocortical development in humans and mice
Carolin Gaiser, Nathaniel Germain, … Ryan L. Muetzel·bioRxiv·Aug 24, 2026