Assessing Ebola Virus Circulation in the Tshuapa Province (Democratic Republic of the Congo): A One Health Investigation of Wildlife and Human Interactions
Rianne van VredendaaliD, Léa JoffriniD, Antea PaviottiiD, Claude MandeiD, Solange MiloloiD, Nicolas LaurentiD, Léa FourchaultiD, Douglas Adroabadrio, Pascal BaeloiD, Steve NgoyiD, Papy Ansobi, Casimir NebesseiD, Martine PeetersiD, Ahidjo AyoubaiD, Maëliss ChampagneiD, Julie BouilliniD, Jana TěšíkováiD, Natalie Van HoutteiD, Sophie GryseelsiD, Maha SalloumiD, Freddy Bikioli BolomboiD, Séverine ThysiD, Jimmy Mpato, Ruben Ilonga, Henri Kimina, , Joachim MariëniD
Abstract
The wildlife reservoir and spillover mechanisms of the Ebola virus remain elusive despite extensive research efforts in endemic areas. This study employed a One Health approach to examine the virus circulation in wildlife and the associated human exposure risks in the Tshuapa province of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. In 2021, we collected 1015 samples from 888 animals, predominantly small mammals, and 380 inhabitants of Inkanamongo village, the site of an Ebola virus disease outbreak in 2014. These samples were screened for evidence of current (RNA) or past (IgG antibodies) Ebola virus infections. We also conducted interviews with 167 individuals in the surrounding districts to assess their interactions with wildlife. While no Ebola virus RNA was detected in the wildlife samples, anti-orthoebolavirus IgG antibodies were found in 13 bats and 38 rodents. Among the human participants, 120 individuals had IgG antibodies against at least one orthoebolavirus antigen, with 12 showing seropositivity for two antigens of the same orthoebolavirus, despite not having a prior Ebola disease diagnosis. Furthermore, over 50% of respondents reported frequent visits to the forest to hunt a variety of wild animals, particularly ungulates and rodents, which could account for occasional viral spillovers. The absence of active Ebola virus circulation in wildlife may reflect seasonal patterns in reservoir ecology, like those observed in bats. Similarly, seasonal human activities, like hunting and foraging, may result in periodic exposure risks. These findings highlight the importance of continuous, multidisciplinary surveillance to monitor changes in seasonal spillover risks.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.29
- Field percentile
- top 11%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Silent Footprints of Ebolavirus in the Forest: Serological Clues from Wild Non-Human Primates in the Democratic Republic of Congo
Charles Kumakamba, Clément Labarrere, … Oleg Mediannikov·bioRxiv·Mar 9, 2026
- Effects of biological and environmental factors on orthoebolavirus serology in bats in Guinea
M. Champagne, J. Cappelle, … H. M. De Nys·bioRxiv·Aug 23, 2023
- Using serosurveys to optimize surveillance for zoonotic pathogens
Erin Clancey, Scott L. Nuismer, Stephanie N. Seifert·EcoHealthPeer-reviewed·Apr 25, 2026
- A Bayesian analysis of birth pulse effects on the probability of detecting Ebola virus in fruit bats
D. R. J. Pleydell, I. Ndong Bass, … J. Cappelle·bioRxiv·Aug 10, 2023
- Predators at the Viral Gate: Multi-Species Foraging at a Marburg Virus Reservoir
B. Atukwatse, O. Cornille, … A. A. Braczkowski·bioRxiv·Jun 16, 2025
- The genetic impact of an Ebola outbreak on a wild gorilla population
Claudia Fontsere, Peter Frandsen, … Tomàs Marquès‐Bonet·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Oct 11, 2021