Communications PsychologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Narrative Context Shifts Gaze from Visual to Semantic Salience
Eva BerlotiD, Lea‐Maria SchmittiD, Christoph Huber‐HuberiD, Marius V. PeeleniD, Floris P. de LangeiD
Abstract
Humans make over a hundred thousand eye movements daily to gather visual information. But what determines where we look? Current computational models typically link gaze behaviour to visual features of isolated images, but we know that eye movements are also strongly shaped by cognitive goals: Observers gather information that helps them to understand, rather than just represent, the world. Within this framework, observers should focus more on information that updates ones understanding of the environment, and less on what is purely visually salient. Here we tested this hypothesis using a free-viewing paradigm of narratives where we experimentally manipulated the meaningfulness of temporal context by either presenting pictures in a coherent, i.e. correct, order, or in a temporally shuffled order. We developed a novel approach to quantify which visual information is semantically salient (i.e., important for understanding): we separately obtained language narratives for images in stories, and computed the contextual surprisal of visual objects using a large language model. The ability of this semantic saliency model in explaining gaze behaviour was compared to a state-of-the art model of visual saliency (DeepGaze-II). We found that individuals looked relatively more often and more quickly at semantically salient objects when images were presented in coherent compared to shuffled order. In contrast, visual salience did not better account for gaze behaviour in coherent than shuffled order. These findings highlight how internal contextual models guide visual sampling and demonstrate that language models could offer a powerful tool for capturing gaze behavior in richer, meaningful settings.
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.83
- Field percentile
- top 13%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Judging the reasons for fixations: A direct experimental method to assess the contribution of saliency and semantic factors to gaze control
Franz Faul, Antje Nuthmann·bioRxiv·Jul 7, 2026
- Meaning Guides Attention in Real-World Scene Images: Evidence from Eye Movements and Meaning Maps
John M. Henderson, Taylor R. Hayes·Journal of VisionPeer-reviewed·Jun 21, 2018
- Semantic object-scene inconsistencies affect eye movements, but not in the way predicted by contextualized meaning maps
Marek A. Pedziwiatr, Matthias Kümmerer, … Christoph Teufel·Journal of VisionPeer-reviewed·Feb 16, 2022
- Can Individual Internal Models Predict Idiosyncratic Scene Exploration?
Micha Engeser, Nasibeh Babaei, DANIEL H. KAISER·bioRxiv·Apr 3, 2026
- Objects Guide Human Gaze Behavior in Dynamic Real-World Scenes
Nicolas Roth, Martin Rolfs, … Klaus Obermayer·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 26, 2023
- Meaning maps and saliency models based on deep convolutional neural networks are insensitive to image meaning when predicting human fixations
Marek A. Pedziwiatr, Matthias Kümmerer, … Christoph Teufel·CognitionPeer-reviewed·Oct 20, 2020