bioRxivAnimal Behavior & CognitionPreprint
Judging the reasons for fixations: A direct experimental method to assess the contribution of saliency and semantic factors to gaze control
- Citations
- 0
Abstract
Current debates regarding the relative contribution of saliency versus semantics to gaze control often rely on comparing the predictive power of saliency and meaning maps. We argue that such indirect, global approaches are fundamentally limited because fixations arise from heterogeneous, local causes that are conflated in whole-scene comparisons. To substantiate this claim, we used a direct method where participants explicitly identified the reasons for fixation at specific clusters of high fixation density, distinguishing between low-level saliency and various semantic categories, as well as the most important one. The obtained judgments revealed that multiple factors contribute simultaneously to gaze control. Although their influence varied across fixation clusters, semantics generally dominated saliency. Notably, abstract semantic categories, particularly "unknown/unusual," proved important, highlighting the role of prior knowledge and novelty besides personal relevance in guiding attention. To interpret these findings in the context of existing models, we propose a framework distinguishing between processes highlighting interesting locations in the image from a sampling strategy translating this information into scanpaths. Within this framework, classic saliency and meaning maps are viewed as restricted inputs to the strategy, whereas deep learning-based models (e.g., DeepGaze IIE) are more general and may also implicitly encode aspects of the strategy itself. Consistent with this, we found that the predictive performance of DeepGaze IIE varied less significantly with the specific reasons for fixation than that of classic saliency and meaning map approaches.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Meaning Guides Attention in Real-World Scene Images: Evidence from Eye Movements and Meaning Maps
John M. Henderson, Taylor R. Hayes·Journal of VisionPeer-reviewed·Jun 21, 2018
- Meaning maps and saliency models based on deep convolutional neural networks are insensitive to image meaning when predicting human fixations
Marek A. Pedziwiatr, Matthias Kümmerer, … Christoph Teufel·CognitionPeer-reviewed·Oct 20, 2020
- Narrative Context Shifts Gaze from Visual to Semantic Salience
Eva Berlot, Lea‐Maria Schmitt, … Floris P. de Lange·Communications PsychologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 19, 2026
- Semantic object-scene inconsistencies affect eye movements, but not in the way predicted by contextualized meaning maps
Marek A. Pedziwiatr, Matthias Kümmerer, … Christoph Teufel·Journal of VisionPeer-reviewed·Feb 16, 2022
- Individual differences in visual salience vary along semantic dimensions
Benjamin de Haas, Alexios L. Iakovidis, … Karl R. Gegenfurtner·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·May 28, 2019
- Objects Guide Human Gaze Behavior in Dynamic Real-World Scenes
Nicolas Roth, Martin Rolfs, … Klaus Obermayer·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 26, 2023