Population receptive field estimates for motion-defined stimuli
Anna E. HughesiD, John A. GreenwoodiD, Nonie J. FinlaysoniD, Dietrich Samuel SchwarzkopfiD
Abstract
The processing of motion changes throughout the visual hierarchy, from spatially restricted local motion in early visual cortex to more complex large-field global motion at later stages. Here we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine spatially selective responses in these areas related to the processing of random-dot stimuli defined by differences in motion. We used population receptive field (pRF) analyses to map retinotopic cortex using bar stimuli comprising coherently moving dots. In the first experiment, we used three separate background conditions: no background dots (dot-defined bar-only), dots moving coherently in the opposite direction to the bar (kinetic boundary) and dots moving incoherently in random directions (global motion). Clear retinotopic maps were obtained for the bar-only and kinetic-boundary conditions across visual areas V1-V3 and in higher dorsal areas. For the global-motion condition, retinotopic maps were much weaker in early areas and became clear only in higher areas, consistent with the emergence of global-motion processing throughout the visual hierarchy. However, in a second experiment we demonstrate that this pattern is not specific to motion-defined stimuli, with very similar results for a transparent-motion stimulus and a bar defined by a static low-level property (dot size) that should have driven responses particularly in V1. We further exclude explanations based on stimulus visibility by demonstrating that the observed differences in pRF properties do not follow the ability of observers to localise or attend to these bar elements. Rather, our findings indicate that dorsal extrastriate retinotopic maps may primarily be determined by the visibility of the neural responses to the bar relative to the background response (i.e. neural signal-to-noise ratios) and suggests that claims about stimulus selectivity from pRF experiments must be interpreted with caution.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 12
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Field percentile
- top 32%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Motion displaces population receptive fields in the direction opposite to motion
Marian Schneider, Ingo Marquardt, … Rainer Goebel·bioRxiv·Sep 9, 2019
- Image segmentation based on relative motion and relative disparity cues in topographically organized areas of human visual cortex
Peter Jes Kohler, Benoit R. Cottereau, Anthony M. Norcia·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jun 26, 2019
- Functional localization of visual motion area FST in humans
Puti Wen, Rania Ezzo, … Bas Rokers·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Improving the Reliability and Accuracy of Population Receptive Field Measures Using a Logarithmically Warped Stimulus.
Kelly Chang, Ione Fine, Geoffrey M. Boynton·Journal of VisionPeer-reviewed·Jan 3, 2025
- Integration of visual motion and pursuit signals in areas V3A and V6+ across cortical depth using 9.4T fMRI
F Molaei-Vaneghi, Natalia Zaretskaya, … Andreas Bartels·bioRxiv·Dec 9, 2021
- Identifying cortical areas that underlie the transformation from retinal to world motion signals
Puti Wen, Michael S. Landy, Bas Rokers·bioRxiv·Jun 14, 2022