Optimal Reinforcement Learning with Asymmetric Updating in Volatile Environments: a Simulation Study
Mojtaba Rostami KandroodiiD, Abdol‐Hossein VahabieiD, Sara AhmadiiD, Babak Nadjar AraabiiD, Majid Nili AhmadabadiiD
Abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWThe ability to predict the future is essential for decision-making and interaction with the environment to avoid punishment and gain reward. Reinforcement learning algorithms provide a normative way for interactive learning, especially in volatile environments. The optimal strategy for the classic reinforcement learning model is to increase the learning rate as volatility increases. Inspired by optimistic bias in humans, an alternative reinforcement learning model has been developed by adding a punishment learning rate to the classic reinforcement learning model. In this study, we aim to 1) compare the performance of these two models in interaction with different environments, and 2) find optimal parameters for the models. Our simulations indicate that having two different learning rates for rewards and punishments increases performance in a volatile environment. Investigation of the optimal parameters shows that in almost all environments, having a higher reward learning rate compared to the punishment learning rate is beneficial for achieving higher performance which in this case is the accumulation of more rewards. Our results suggest that to achieve high performance, we need a shorter memory window for recent rewards and a longer memory window for punishments. This is consistent with optimistic bias in human behavior.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 9
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Nonlinear influence of reward volatility on arbitration between multiple learning strategies reflects cost-benefit optimization
Taiji Yamada, Kazuyuki Samejima·bioRxiv·Jun 19, 2026
- The shadowing effect of initial expectation on learning asymmetry
Jingwei Sun, Yinmei Ni, Jian Li·bioRxiv·Nov 22, 2022
- A normative account of confirmation bias during reinforcement learning
G. Lefebvre, C. Summerfield, R. Bogacz·bioRxiv·May 12, 2020
- Asymmetric Reinforcement Learning Explains Human Choice Patterns in Decision-making Under Risk
Niloufar Shahdoust, Rhiannon L Cowan, … Elliot H. Smith·bioRxiv·Mar 11, 2026
- Confirmation bias optimizes reward learning
T. Tarantola, T. Folke, … B. De Martino·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2021
- A nonlinear relationship between prediction errors and learning rates in human reinforcement learning
Boluwatife Ikwunne, Jolie Parham, Erdem Pulcu·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 12, 2025