Genomic and Epigenomic Relationships Capture Different Patterns of Genotype-by-Environment Interaction in Grapevine Clones
Hannah RobinsoniD, Maximilian SchmidtiD, Paolo CallipoiD, Carlos A. Robles-Zazueta, Stephanie Brunner, Jessica HintzscheiD, Ulduz Vafadarshamasbi, Johanna Frotscher, Timo StrackiD, Peter A. CrispiD, Hans-Peter Piepho, Kai P. Voss-FelsiD
Abstract
Genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) challenges selection in clonally propagated perennial crops by reducing the consistency of clone performance across years. In perennial crops, both genetic and epigenetic variation are likely to contribute to complex trait variation among clones. However, the extent to which each molecular source contribute to GEI remains poorly understood. Here, we used UMR-seq, an assay that recovers SNPs and unmethylated-region (UMR; DNA methylation) profiles from a single library, to generate paired genomic and epigenomic profiles for 206 Riesling (Vitis vinifera L.) clones phenotyped for yield and juice quality traits across nine growing seasons. We then partitioned the contribution of each omic layer to clonal variation and GEI, and examined the genomic distribution of their effects. In models without explicit GEI, environmental and residual effects were the largest source of phenotypic variance and the clonal main effect was modest. Genomic relationships accounted for most of the clonal variance in four of five traits, and adding an epigenomic relationship matrix (ERM) to the genomic relationship matrix (GRM) had little effect. In contrast, when GEI effects were modelled using factor-analytic covariance structures, the epigenomic layer captured a substantial proportion of GEI variance and exceeded the genomic contribution in four of five traits. The two omic layers differed not only in the amount of GEI captured, but also in the pattern of clone re-ranking across years. When back-solved effects were aggregated into genomic windows, the largest genomic and epigenomic effects tended to fall in different regions, with overlap no greater than expected by chance. Together, these results show that genomic and epigenomic relationships capture complementary components of year-to-year variation in clone performance, with the epigenomic contribution expressed primarily through GEI. These findings provide a basis for investigating the molecular drivers of GEI and for testing whether genomic and epigenomic information can inform selection for stable clonal performance across variable environments.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A dual genomic-epigenomic map of clonal evolution in grapevine
Paolo Callipo, Hannah M. Robinson, … Kai P. Voss‐Fels·bioRxiv·Jan 9, 2026
- Epigenomic patterns reflect irrigation and grafting in the grapevine clone 'Chambourcin'
Brigette R. Williams, Christine E. Edwards, … Allison J. Miller·bioRxiv·Sep 9, 2020
- Environmental Conditions And Agronomic Practices Induce Consistent Global Changes In DNA Methylation Patterns In Grapevine (Vitis vinifera cv Shiraz)
Huahan Xie, Moumouni Konate, … Carlos Marcelino Rodriguez Lopez·bioRxiv·Apr 29, 2017
- Genetic control of leaf carbon- and water-related traits in grapevine under greenhouse and field conditions
Eva Coindre, Sarah Desirée Etou, … Aude Coupel‐Ledru·bioRxiv·Oct 5, 2026
- Clonal propagation history shapes the intra-cultivar genetic diversity in Malbec grapevines
Luciano Calderón, Nuria Mauri, … Diego Lijavetzky·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2020
- The genomic diversification of clonally propagated grapevines
Amanda M. Vondras, Andrea Minio, … Dario Cantù·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2019