Sign in
BioinformaticsbioRxiv
Preprint

SEARCH_16S: A new algorithm for identifying 16S ribosomal RNA genes in contigs and chromosomes

R. C. EdgariD

Abstract

SEARCH_16S is a new algorithm that annotates 16S ribosomal RNA genes in microbial genomes and metagenomic sequences. Word counting is used to identify candidate segments, then conserved motifs are used to identify homologous loci close to the gene boundaries. SEARCH_16S has >99% sensitivity to known 16S genes.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Abstract summary

Verified abstract synthesis

Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 18 Oct 2026 · from the abstract

Word counting flags candidate regions and conserved motifs pin down gene boundaries, annotating 16S rRNA genes in microbial genomes and metagenomic sequence with reported sensitivity above 99%.

Finding 16S ribosomal RNA genes in microbial genomes and in metagenomic sequence is the task SEARCH_16S targets, and its second stage aims at the gene boundaries rather than only at a hit. It pairs a word-counting step that picks candidate segments with conserved-motif matching at homologous loci close to those boundaries, and is reported to have above 99% sensitivity to known 16S genes.

Key results

  1. SuggestedThe algorithm is reported to recover almost all previously catalogued 16S rRNA genes.

    Stated sensitivity of >99% to known 16S genes; the abstract gives no evaluation set, no count of genes tested and no comparison with other annotation tools. · Abstract

  2. ClaimedDetection is split into a candidate-finding stage and a motif-based stage that locates where the gene starts and ends.

    Word counting selects candidate segments; conserved motifs then mark homologous loci close to each gene boundary. No timing, accuracy-per-stage or boundary-precision numbers are given. · Abstract

Methods, data and reproducibility

A two-stage annotation algorithm for 16S ribosomal RNA genes: word counting selects candidate segments of a microbial genome or metagenomic sequence, after which conserved motifs are matched to identify homologous loci near each end of the gene.

Methods & tools
SEARCH_16S
Limitations (2)
  • Only sensitivity is reported; the abstract gives no specificity or false-positive rate, so the cost of the >99% recall is unknown. · noted in this summary
  • No benchmark is described: the set of known 16S genes used for evaluation, its size, and any competing annotation tools are all unnamed. · noted in this summary

Who should read:Read this if you annotate 16S rRNA genes in assembled genomes or metagenomic contigs and need boundaries located, not just gene presence flagged.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISBhattachary '24Edgar '18Karstens '19Ebou '21Olson '19Miao '24
54% semantic matchBioinformatics
Madhumita Bhattacharyya, Luise Rauer, Matthias Reiger+4 more·bioRxiv·Oct 31, 2024· 1 citations