Frontiers in Systems NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
A neuroanatomically grounded optimal control model of the compensatory eye movement system
Peter J. HollandiD, Tafadzwa M. SibindiiD, Marik Ginzburg, Suman DasiD, Kiki ArkesteijniD, Maarten A. FrensiD, Opher DonchiniD
Abstract
We present a working model of the compensatory eye movement system. We challenge the model with a data set of eye movements in mice (n=34) recorded in 4 different sinusoidal stimulus conditions with 36 different combinations of frequency (0.1-3.2 Hz) and amplitude (0.5-8{degrees}) in each condition. The conditions included vestibular stimulation in the dark (vestibular-ocular reflex, VOR), optokinetic stimulation (optokinetic reflex, OKR), and two combined visual/vestibular conditions (the visual-vestibular ocular reflex, vVOR, and visual suppression of the VOR, sVOR). The model successfully reproduced the eye movements in all conditions, except for minor failures to predict phase when gain was very low. Most importantly, it could explain the non-linear summation of VOR and OKR when the two reflexes are activated simultaneously during vVOR stimulation. In addition to our own data, we also reproduced the behavior of the compensatory eye movement system found in the existing literature. These include its response to sum-of-sines stimuli, its response after lesions of the nucleus prepositus hypoglossi or the flocculus, characteristics of VOR adaptation, and characteristics of drift in the dark. Our model is based on ideas of state prediction and forward modeling that have been widely used in the study of motor control. However, it represents one of the first quantitative efforts to simulate the full range of behaviors of a specific system. The model has two separate processing loops, one for vestibular stimulation and one for visual stimulation. Importantly, state prediction in the visual processing loop depends on a forward model of residual retinal slip after vestibular processing. In addition, we hypothesize that adaptation in the system is primarily adaptation of this model. In other words, VOR adaptation happens primarily in the OKR loop.
- Citations
- 11
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Field percentile
- top 30%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Closed-loop optogenetic perturbation of macaque oculomotor cerebellum: evidence for an internal saccade model
Robijanto Soetedjo, Gregory D. Horwitz·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 5, 2024
- Beyond the vestibulo-ocular reflex: Vestibular input is processed centrally to achieve visual stability
Edwin S. Dalmaijer·VisionPeer-reviewed·Mar 21, 2018
- Visuo-vestibular gaze control - conserved subcortical processing
Tobias Wibble, Tony Pansell, … Juan Pérez‐Fernández·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Aug 10, 2022
- Spike burst-pause dynamics of Purkinje cells regulate sensorimotor adaptation
Niceto R. Luque, Francisco Naveros, … Angelo Arleo·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 12, 2019
- Modeling Human Visuomotor Adaptation with a DisturbanceObserver Framework
Gaurav Sharma, Bernard Marius ’t Hart, … Mireille E. Broucke·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 4, 2026
- A velocity plan with internal feedback control best explains modulation of saccade kinematics during eye-hand coordination.
V Varsha, Atul Gopal, … Aditya Murthy·bioRxiv·Oct 8, 2020