Journal of Neuroscience MethodsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Source to sensor coupling (SoSeC) as an effective tool to localize interacting sources from EEG and MEG data
Florian GöschliD, Dionysia KazikiiD, Gregor LeichtiD, Andreas Karl EngeliD, Guido NolteiD
Abstract
A standard approach to estimate interacting sources from EEG or MEG data is to first calculate a coupling between all pairs of voxels on a predefined grid within the brain and then average or maximize this coupling matrix along each column or row. Depending on the chosen coupling measure and grid size this approach can be computationally very costly, in particular when a bias is supposed to be removed. We here suggest to replace this approach by a maximization of coupling between each source and the signal in sensor space. The idea is that any neuronal activity which can be estimated from recorded data must be present in sensor space in the first place. Using the imaginary part of coherency as coupling measure makes sure that we do not confuse this source to sensor coupling with a coupling of a source to itself. We found that this approach is hundreds of times faster than the conventional approach. Results for EEG resting state data indicate that the new approach has more statistical power than the conventional approach. The presentation of this specific method is augmented with a discussion of conceptual issues for various forms of vector beamformers and eLoreta.
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Field percentile
- top 38%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Ghost interactions in MEG/EEG source space: A note of caution on inter-areal coupling measures
Jaakko Matias Palva, Sheng Hua Wang, … Karim Jerbi·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Feb 22, 2018
- Multi-Source Neural Activity Indices for EEG/MEG Localization: A Two-Stage Spatial Filtering Framework and Extension to MNE-Python
Julia Jurkowska, Joanna Dreszer, … Tomasz Piotrowski·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jul 26, 2026
- Comparing EEG/MEG neuroimaging methods based on localization error, false positive activity, and false positive connectivity
Roberto Domingo Pascual-Marqui, Pascal Luc Faber, … Masafumi Yoshimura·bioRxiv·Feb 22, 2018
- Is sensor space analysis good enough? Spatial patterns as a tool for assessing spatial mixing of EEG/MEG rhythms
Natalie Schaworonkow, Vadim V. Nikulin·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Mar 11, 2022
- Towards an Objective Evaluation of EEG/MEG Source Estimation Methods: The Linear Tool Kit
Olaf Hauk, Matti Stenroos, Matthias Sebastian Treder·bioRxiv·Jun 18, 2019
- The more, the merrier: multivariate phase synchronization methods excel pairwise ones in estimating brain connectivity from reconstructed neural sources