bioRxivEvolutionary BiologyPreprint
Quantifying between-species differences in morphological integration patterns using two-block PLS: an R implementation and sensitivity analysis
Abstract
Morphological integration is commonly quantified within species using covariance or correlation structures, and two-block partial least squares (PLS) has become a standard tool for assessing covariation between anatomical modules. However, most applications focus on a global PLS axis for a pooled sample, and there is no simple, widely used procedure to compare whether integration patterns differ between species in the same PLS space. Here I present an angle-based method and an accompanying R function, Integration_Patterns, that quantify between-species differences in integration patterns based on the orientation of the first eigenvector of the within-species covariance matrix in PLS1-PLS1 space. For each species, the method extracts PLS1 scores for two modules, computes the covariance matrix, retrieves the principal eigenvector representing the main axis of covariation, and then measures the angle (0-90{degrees}) between these axes across species. Small angles indicate nearly parallel integration patterns, whereas larger angles indicate divergent or orthogonal patterns. To evaluate the behaviour and robustness of the estimator, I conducted a simulation-based sensitivity analysis using species-specific PLS1 scores. Pairs of species were simulated under known angular separations (0{degrees}, 30{degrees}, 45{degrees}, 60{degrees}, 90{degrees}) and a range of per-species sample sizes (n = 3 to 200). For each combination, 100 replicate datasets were generated and the between-species angle was estimated. The results show that the estimator is biased and highly variable for very small samples (n [≤] 10), but converges rapidly to the true angle with increasing sample size. For n {approx} 20-30 individuals per species, the mean estimated angle is close to the true value and the standard deviation is substantially reduced across all scenarios, including orthogonal patterns (90{degrees}). These findings provide practical guidance on sample-size requirements when comparing integration patterns across species.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Integration and modularity in Procrustes shape data: is there a risk of spurious results?
A. Cardini·bioRxiv·Jul 19, 2018
- On Rank Deficiency in Phenotypic Covariance
F. R. OKeefe·bioRxiv·Jul 23, 2020
- Reliable Phylogenetic Regressions for Multivariate Comparative Data: Illustration with the MANOVA and Application to the Effect of Diet on Mandible Morphology in Phyllostomid Bats
- Statistics of eigenvalue dispersion indices: quantifying the magnitude of phenotypic integration
J. Watanabe·bioRxiv·Jun 19, 2021
- Evaluating permutation-based inference for partial least squares analysis of neuroimaging data
Matthew Danyluik, Yashar Zeighami, … M. Mallar Chakravarty·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 18, 2024
- Sizing up phylogenetic testing in geometric morphometrics: A case study of allometry
D. Rex Mitchell, Ben Halliwell, … Vera Weisbecker·Bijdragen tot de DierkundePeer-reviewed·Jul 6, 2026