Peer Community JournalGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Comparing DNA extraction methods for successful PacBio HiFi sequencing: a case study of the freshwater mussel Anodonta anatina (Bivalvia: Unionidae)
Marco Giulio, Urs Lergster, Philine G. D. FeulneriD, Alexandra Anh‐Thu WeberiD
Abstract
High-quality reference genomes are increasingly recognized as essential resources in biodiversity genomics and conservation. However, successful DNA extraction and long-read sequencing remain highly organism-dependent. Molluscs, a diverse phylum of invertebrates, pose particular challenges due to the presence of inhibitory compounds and the difficulty of obtaining high-molecular-weight DNA, often necessitating careful optimization of extraction protocols. Here, we present a case study on the freshwater mussel Anodonta anatina (Bivalvia: Unionidae), evaluating two preservation methods, six DNA extraction protocols, and two post-extraction clean-up steps for their effects on DNA quality and PacBio HiFi sequencing yield from foot tissue of a single individual. The PacBio Nanobind and CTAB protocols produced high-quality DNA from fresh tissue but performed poorly on flash-frozen tissue. Post-extraction clean-up generally degraded DNA and did not improve sequencing yield. Unexpectedly, the column-based Omega Mollusc Kit, although not designed for high-molecular-weight DNA, performed better than the PacBio-recommended Nanobind kit and the manual CTAB method on flash-frozen tissue. It generated high DNA quantity and purity, sufficient integrity for HiFi sequencing, and appeared to remove contaminants effectively. While the resulting DNA may be too fragmented for ultra-long read sequencing, the Omega Mollusc Kit offers a practical, cost-effective first approach for testing DNA extraction and PacBio sequencing in flash-frozen A. anatina foot tissue. When fresh tissue is available, Nanobind or CTAB were the best-performing options in our comparison. Overall, our results provide a practical starting point for protocol selection, while acknowledging that validation across other mollusc species, tissue types, and preservation methods remains important. This strategy could reduce the need for extensive protocol optimization and facilitate future mollusc genomics efforts.
- organism: mouse
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 1th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparison of DNA extraction methods for non-marine molluscs: Is modified CTAB DNA extraction method more efficient than DNA extraction kits?
Sudeshna Chakraborty, Anwesha Saha, Aravind Neelavar Ananthram·3 BiotechPeer-reviewed·Jan 25, 2020
- Genomic DNA extraction optimization and validation for genome sequencing using the marine gastropod Kellet's whelk
Benjamin N. Daniels, Jenna Nurge, … Crow White·PeerJPeer-reviewed·Dec 6, 2023
- Evaluation of eight protocols for genomic DNA extraction of Hypostomus commersoni (Valenciennes, 1836), Siluriformes: Loricariidae.
Priscila Mezzomo, Albanin Aparecida Mielniczki-Pereira, … Rogério Luís Cansian·Brazilian Journal of BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 26, 2020
- FindingNemo: A Toolkit for DNA Extraction, Library Preparation and Purification for Ultra Long Nanopore Sequencing
Inswasti Cahyani, John J. Tyson, … Matthew Loose·bioRxiv·Aug 16, 2024
- DNA extraction and sequencing of the Mawangdui ancient cadaver protected by formalin
Hualin Huang, Shikui Yin, … Zhiyuan Li·bioRxiv·May 6, 2020
- High-Molecular-Weight Genomic DNA Extraction from Recalcitrant Australian Plants: An Optimised CTAB Protocol for Anigozanthos
Rashika Rajput, Linkon Saha, … Cornelia M. Hooper·bioRxiv·Aug 31, 2026