PLoS ONENeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Characterizing upper extremity motor behavior in the first week after stroke
Jessica BarthiD, Shashwati GeediD, Abigail Mitchell, Peter S. LumiD, Dorothy Farrar EdwardsiD, Alexander W. DromerickiD
Abstract
BackgroundAnimal models of brain recovery identify the first days after lesioning as a time of great flux in sensorimotor function and physiology; these findings have implications for human stroke recovery. After rodent motor system lesioning, daily skill training in the less affected forelimb reduces skill acquisition in the more affected forelimb. We asked whether spontaneous human motor behaviors of the less affected upper extremity (UE) early after stroke resemble the animal training model, with the potential to suppress clinical recovery.\n\nMethodsThis prospective observational study used a convenience sample of patients <7 days after stroke (n=25) with a wide severity range; Controls were hospitalized for non-neurological conditions (n=12). Outcome measures were Accelerometry, Upper-Extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Shoulder Abduction/ Finger Extension Test (SAFE), NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS).\n\nResultsAccelerometry indicated total paretic UE movement was reduced compared to controls, primarily due to a 44% reduction of bilateral UE use. Unilateral paretic movement was unchanged. Movement shifted to unilateral use of the nonparetic UE, which increased by 77%. Low correlations between movement time and motor performance prompted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealing a 2-component solution; motor performance tests load on one component (motor performance) whereas accelerometry-derived variables load on a second non-orthogonal component (quantity of movement).\n\nConclusionsEarly after stroke, spontaneous overall UE movement is reduced, and movement shifts to unilateral use of the nonparetic UE. Thus, spontaneously-arising UE motor behaviors early after stroke are potential substrates for two mechanisms associated with poorer motor outcomes in animal models: learned non-use and inhibition of motor recovery through training of the nonparetic side. Accurate UE motor assessment requires two independent constructs: motor performance and quantity of movement. These findings provide opportunities and measurement methods for studies to develop new behaviorally-based stroke recovery treatments that begin early after onset.
- Citations
- 41
- FWCI
- 2.77
- Field percentile
- top 8%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Finger recruitment patterns during mirror movements suggest two systems for hand recovery after stroke
Naveed Ejaz, Jing Xu, … Jörn Diedrichsen·bioRxiv·Apr 22, 2017
- Spatial mapping of posture-dependent resistance to passive displacement of the hypertonic arm post-stroke
P. Kanade-Mehta, M. Bengtson, … R. A. Scheidt·bioRxiv·Nov 13, 2022
- Reduction in voluntary activation of elbow and wrist muscles in individuals with chronic hemiparetic stroke
L. R. P. Garmirian, J. P. A. Dewald, A. M. Acosta·bioRxiv·Jul 2, 2019
- Separating the control of moving and holding in post-stroke arm paresis
Alkis M. Hadjiosif, Kahori Kita, … John W. Krakauer·bioRxiv·Nov 26, 2022
- Predictors of arm non-use in chronic stroke: a preliminary investigation
Laurel J. Buxbaum, Rini Varghese, … Carolee Joyce Winstein·Neurorehabilitation and neural repairPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2020
- Use of the non-paretic arm reflects a habitual behaviour in chronic stroke
Sebastian Sporn, E Bonyadi, … Nick Ward·Journal of NeuroEngineering and RehabilitationPeer-reviewed·Jun 18, 2025