Finger recruitment patterns during mirror movements suggest two systems for hand recovery after stroke
Naveed EjaziD, Jing XuiD, Meret BranscheidtiD, Benjamin Hertler, Heidi M. SchambraiD, Mario WidmeriD, Andreia Vasconcellos FariaiD, Michelle D. Harran, Juan Camilo CortésiD, Nathan KimiD, Tomoko KitagoiD, Pablo A. CelnikiD, Andreas Rüdiger LuftiD, John W. KrakaueriD, Jörn DiedrichseniD
Abstract
Accumulating behavioural and neurophysiological evidence suggests that upper-limb control relies on contributions from both cortical and subcortical motor circuits, with cortical inputs providing fine-finger function and subcortical inputs providing the ability for gross movements, respectively. During recovery of function after stroke, the relative contributions from these pathways may shift. Here we propose that mirror movements that appear after stroke provide a non-invasive assay through which relative contributions from cortical and subcortical pathways towards hand recovery can be studied. We hypothesized that mirror movements, like hand function, are generated by summed contributions from cortical and subcortical pathways, and suggest that subcortical contributions should be characterized by a broad recruitment of fingers, while cortical contributions primarily recruit the homologous finger in the passive hand. In a longitudinal stroke recovery study (Xu et al., 2016), we quantified mirror movements and paretic hand function in 53 stroke patients in the year following unilateral stroke. Mirror movements in the non-paretic hand were exaggerated early after damage (week 2), with paretic finger presses broadly recruiting multiple fingers in the non-paretic hand. On average, however, mirroring in homologous fingers was 1.76 times larger than in non-homologous fingers. Over the year, mirroring in the non-paretic hand progressively normalized with a time-course that mimicked that for the fine-finger deficits in the paretic hand. In comparison, during non-paretic finger presses, the homologous component of mirroring in the paretic hand was reduced early after stroke (week 2) but progressively normalized. Altogether, we conclude that the pattern of mirror movements across homologous and non-homologous fingers reflect the summed contributions of both cortical and subcortical systems, and we discuss the implications of our results towards hand recovery after stroke.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 7
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Recovery of hand function after stroke: separable systems for finger strength and control
Jing Xu, Naveed Ejaz, … Jörn Diedrichsen·bioRxiv·Oct 7, 2016
- Contralesional activity reflects compensation, while brainstem detour pathways support skilled motor recovery after stroke
Matteo Panzeri, Nina Thiem, … Anna-Sophia Wahl·bioRxiv·Nov 24, 2025
- Theoretical proposal for restoration of hand motor function utilizing plasticity of motor-cortical interhemispheric interaction
Hideki Nakano, Yandi Tang, … Eiichi Naito·bioRxiv·May 30, 2024
- Characterizing upper extremity motor behavior in the first week after stroke
Jessica Barth, Shashwati Geed, … Alexander W. Dromerick·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Aug 10, 2020
- Loss of finger control complexity and intrusion of flexor biases are dissociable in finger individuation impairment after stroke
Jing Xu, Timothy Ma, … John W. Krakauer·bioRxiv·Aug 29, 2023
- No evidence for motor recovery-related cortical reorganization after stroke using resting-state fMRI
Meret Branscheidt, Naveed Ejaz, … John W. Krakauer·bioRxiv·Jun 26, 2019