Journal of NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Worth the work? Monkeys discount rewards by a subjective adapting effort cost
Mark BurrelliD, Alexandre Pastor‐BernieriD, Wolfram SchultziD
Abstract
All life must solve how to allocate limited energy resources to maximise benefits from scarce opportunities. Economic theory posits decision makers optimise choice by maximising the subjective benefit (utility) of reward minus the subjective cost (disutility) of the required effort. While successful in many settings, this model does not fully account for how experience can alter reward-effort trade-offs. Here we test how well the subtractive model of effort disutility explains the behavior of two non-human primates (Macaca mulatta) in a binary choice task in which reward quantity and physical effort to obtain were varied.Applying random utility modelling to independently estimate reward utility and effort disutility, we show the subtractive effort model better explains out-of-sample choice behavior when compared to parabolic and exponential effort discounting. Furthermore, we demonstrate that effort disutility is dependent on previous experience of effort: in analogy to work from behavioral labour economics, we develop a model of reference-dependent effort disutility to explain the increased willingness to expend effort following previous experience of effortful options in a session. The result of this analysis suggests that monkeys discount reward by an effort cost that is measured relative to an expected effort learned from previous trials. When this subjective cost of effort, a function of context and experience, is accounted for, trial-by-trial choice behavior can be explained by the subtractive cost model of effort.Therefore, in searching for net utility signals that may underpin effort-based decision-making in the brain, careful measurement of subjective effort costs is an essential first step. SignificanceAll decision-makers need to consider how much effort they need to expend when evaluating potential options. Economic theories suggest that the optimal way to choose is by cost-benefit analysis of reward against effort. To be able to do this efficiently over many decision contexts, this needs to be done flexibly, with appropriate adaptation to context and experience. Therefore, in aiming to understand how this might be achieved in the brain, it is important to first carefully measure the subjective cost of effort. Here we show monkeys make reward-effort cost-benefit decisions, subtracting the subjective cost of effort from the subjective value of rewards. Moreover, the subjective cost of effort is dependent on the monkeys experience of effort in previous trials.
- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 1.46
- Field percentile
- top 19%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Efficient decision-makers evaluate relative reward per effort
J. Kubanek·bioRxiv·May 31, 2022
- Optimal foraging requires coordinating decisions with movements
Clara Saleri, Gislene Gardechaux, … David Thura·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Apr 17, 2026
- Adaptation of utility functions to reward distribution in rhesus monkeys
P. Bujold, S. Ferrari-Toniolo, W. Schultz·bioRxiv·May 22, 2020
- C. elegans food choice exhibits effort discounting-like behavior
Jonathan RM Millet, Serge Faumont, … Shawn R. Lockery·bioRxiv·Mar 10, 2025
- Parameter-dependent shift from rational to irrational decisions in mice
Nathan A. Schneider, Benjamin Ballintyn, … Hyun-Jae Pi·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 12, 2021
- Reward value revealed by auction in rhesus monkeys
A. Al Mohammad, W. Schultz·bioRxiv·Dec 11, 2019