bioRxivAnimal Behavior & CognitionPreprint
Asymmetric Costs of Coordination Errors Generate Selection on Social and Sensorimotor Phenotypes in an Animal Collective
Abstract
Animal collectives are dynamic social environments where individuals must continually coordinate their behavior with neighbors. Sensorimotor limitations like processing delays make coordination errors inevitable and, in high-stakes contexts like collective predator evasion and courtship, errors can be extremely costly. Identifying errors and quantifying their costs are challenging in flocks and schools, so collective behavior models traditionally treat errors as random noise. However, if instead the rate and severity of costly errors within collectives are biased towards certain phenotypes, selection against error-prone phenotypes is a neglected feature of the selective landscape. We tested this in experimental choruses of a call-alternating frog (tungara frogs, Physalaemus [=Engystomops] pustulosus). Here inadvertent synchronous calls represent discrete coordination errors attributable to sensorimotor limitations rather than strategy, and they carry steep attractiveness costs; mate-searching females disfavor synchronous calls, especially the following calls of synchronous call pairs. Synchronous calls were frequent, and synchrony outcomes varied non-randomly by social and sensorimotor phenotypes. Inter-male compatibility in intrinsic call rhythms structured synchrony, causing males with slower rhythms to synchronize at higher rates. Furthermore, during synchrony, males with longer response latencies more often produced costlier following calls. Bayesian simulations combining interaction data with experimentally derived female preference estimates revealed that these mechanistic linkages between male phenotypes and synchrony outcomes generated systematic female biases against males with slower call rhythms and longer response latencies. Thus, coordination errors are not unstructured noise. Rather, phenotype-dependent variation in the frequency and/or severity of errors can generate directional selection on social phenotypes and their sensorimotor underpinnings in animal collectives.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Cadences of the Collective: Conspecific Stimulation Patterns Interact with Endogenous Rhythms to Cue Socially Mediated Response Shifts
Luke C. Larter, Colby W. Cushing, Michael J. Ryan·Journal of Experimental BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 25, 2025
- Spatial proximity and dyadic social relationships affect ungulate behavioral synchrony
George M. W. Hodgson, Kate Jade Flay, … Alan G. McElligott·bioRxiv·Aug 6, 2025
- Partitioning variance in a signaling trade-off under sexual selection reveals among-individual covariance in trait allocation
M. S. Reichert, I. de la Hera, M. Moiron·bioRxiv·Oct 10, 2022
- The significance of social interactions in synchronized swarming flight in a termite
N. Mizumoto, T. Nozaki·bioRxiv·Dec 25, 2023
- Individual, but not population asymmetries, are modulated by social environment and genotype in Drosophila melanogaster
Elisabetta Versace, Matteo Caffini, … Benjamin L. de Bivort·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Mar 11, 2020
- Interacting fruit flies synchronize behavior
U. Klibaite, J. W. Shaevitz·bioRxiv·Feb 10, 2019