From head to tail: does habitat use drive morphological variation in snakes?
Abstract
Convergence is a hallmark of adaptive evolution, yet its extent across different taxa remains unclear. Snakes, with over 4,100 species worldwide, provide a unique model to explore how habitat use influences morphology in a group with an at first sight uniform body plan. We here quantified body, head, and tail shape in over 400 species ([~]10% of the global snake diversity) to assess the role of habitat use in shaping morphological variation. Our results reveal significant differences across ecological groups, with habitat use acting as a key driver of phenotypic diversity. Terrestrial species display the highest morphological diversity in contrast to other habitat groups which appear morphologically specialized. For example, whereas arboreal and semi-arboreal species exhibit elongated heads and slender necks, aquatic and semi-aquatic snakes share streamlined bodies and narrow heads. Fossorial and semi-fossorial species, on the other hand, have compact bodies. Surprisingly, morphological convergence remains limited to arboreal, semi-arboreal, and terrestrial habitat groups. Thus, despite strong functional constraints, evolutionary convergence in fossorial and aquatic species is weak, indicating multiple adaptive solutions rather than a single morphological trajectory. Morphological disparity patterns show that non-specialist ecologies generally exhibit greater disparity than highly specialized ones, in accordance with the need of these species to move in different habitats. Our findings underscore the role of ecological constraints in shaping snake morphology and highlight the complexity of adaptation beyond strict convergent evolution. Lay summaryThe living environment of a species has been suggested to play a key role in shaping its morphology. Our study aimed to understand whether and how habitat use has influenced the evolution of external body and head shape in snakes. To do so, we gathered a comprehensive dataset of morphological traits from 436 snake species. Our findings reveal that species living in different habitats are morphologically distinct with species living in similar habitats displaying similar morphologies despite the conserved morphology of snakes.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.28
- Field percentile
- top 6%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Divergent paths, convergent heads: morphological adaptation of head shape to habitat use and diet in snakes.
David Hudry, Anthony Herrel·Journal of MorphologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2025
- Exploring the functional meaning of head shape disparity in aquatic snakes.
M. Segall, R. Cornette, … A. Herrel·bioRxiv·Jan 8, 2020
- Armed to the teeth: the underestimated diversity in tooth shape in snakes and its relationship to feeding constraints
M. Segall, C. Houssin, … M. Dumont·bioRxiv·Dec 13, 2022
- Morphological limitations imposed on lizards facing urbanization
K. W. Row, O. Villasana-Espinosa, … L. O. Frishkoff·bioRxiv·May 9, 2023
- Biophysical constraints on avian adaptation and diversification
F. Sayol, B. Reijenga, … A. L. Pigot·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2025
- Habitat determines convergent evolution of cephalic horns in vipers
T. Busschau, S. Boissinot·bioRxiv·Oct 24, 2021