NeuroImageNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Permutation-based group sequential analyses for cognitive neuroscience
Abstract
Cognitive neuroscientists have been grappling with two related experimental design problems. First, the complexity of neuroimaging data (e.g. often hundreds of thousands of correlated measurements) and analysis pipelines demands bespoke, non-parametric statistical tests for valid inference, and these tests often lack an agreed-upon method for performing a priori power analyses. Thus, sample size determination for neuroimaging studies is often arbitrary or inferred from other putatively but questionably similar studies, which can result in underpowered designs - undermining the efficacy of neuroimaging research. Second, when meta-analyses estimate the sample sizes required to obtain reasonable statistical power, estimated sample sizes can be prohibitively large given the resource constraints of many labs. We propose the use of sequential analyses to partially address both of these problems. Sequential study designs - in which the data is analyzed at interim points during data collection and data collection can be stopped if the planned test statistic satisfies a stopping rule specified a priori - are common in the clinical trial literature, due to the efficiency gains they afford over fixed-sample designs. However, the corrections used to control false positive rates in existing approaches to sequential testing rely on parametric assumptions that are often violated in neuroimaging settings. We introduce a general permutation scheme that allows sequential designs to be used with arbitrary test statistics. By simulation, we show that this scheme controls the false positive rate across multiple interim analyses. Then, performing power analyses for seven evoked response effects seen in the EEG literature, we show that this sequential analysis approach can substantially outperform fixed-sample approaches (i.e. require fewer subjects, on average, to detect a true effect) when study designs are sufficiently well-powered. To facilitate the adoption of this methodology, we provide a Python package "niseq" with sequential implementations of common tests used for neuroimaging: cluster-based permutation tests, threshold-free cluster enhancement, t-max, F-max, and the network-based statistic with tutorial examples using EEG and fMRI data.
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: software / tool
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- approach: simulation
- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.81
- Field percentile
- top 28%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Enlarging the Scope of Randomization and Permutation Tests in Neuroimaging and Neuroscience
Eric Maris·bioRxiv·Feb 1, 2020
- Semiparametric Confidence Sets for Arbitrary Effect Sizes in Longitudinal Neuroimaging
Xinyu Zhang, Kenneth Liao, … Simon Vandekar·bioRxiv·Feb 10, 2025
- Neurodesign: Optimal experimental designs for task fMRI
Joke Durnez, Ross W. Blair, Russell Alan Poldrack·bioRxiv·Mar 18, 2018
- Hyperbolic trade-off: the importance of balancing trial and subject sample sizes in neuroimaging
Gang Chen, Daniel S. Pine, … Simone P. Haller·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Dec 11, 2021
- Getting Blood from a Stone: Improving Neural Inferences without Additional Neural Data
David J. Halpern, Todd Matthew Gureckis·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Group-level inference of information-based measures for the analyses of cognitive brain networks from neurophysiological data
Etienne Combrisson, Michele Allegra, … Andrea Brovelli·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·May 31, 2022