Sign in
NeuroscienceEuropean Journal of Neuroscience
Peer-reviewed journal article

Pupillometry and the vigilance decrement: Task-evoked but not baseline pupil measures reflect declining performance in visual vigilance tasks

Joel T. MartiniD, Annalise H. Whittaker, Stephen J. JohnstoniD

Abstract

Baseline and task-evoked pupil measures are known to reflect the activity of the nervous systems central arousal mechanisms. With the increasing availability, affordability and flexibility of video-based eye tracking hardware, these measures may one day find practical application in real-time biobehavioral monitoring systems to assess performance or fitness for duty in tasks requiring vigilant attention. But real-world vigilance tasks are predominantly visual in their nature and most research in this area has taken place in the auditory domain. Here we explore the relationship between pupil size--both baseline and task-evoked--and behavioral performance measures in two novel vigilance tasks requiring visual target detection: 1) a traditional vigilance task involving prolonged, continuous, and uninterrupted performance (n = 28), and 2) a psychomotor vigilance task (n = 25). In both tasks, behavioral performance and task- evoked pupil responses declined as time spent on task increased, corroborating previous reports in the literature of a vigilance decrement with a corresponding reduction in task-evoked pupil measures. Also in line with previous findings, baseline pupil size did not show a consistent relationship with performance measures. We discuss our findings considering the adaptive gain theory of locus coeruleus function and question the validity of the assumption that baseline (prestimulus) pupil size and task-evoked (poststimulus) pupil measures correspond to the tonic and phasic firing modes of the LC.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
26
FWCI
2.71
Field percentile
top 10%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISGanea '20Regnath '21Ruuskanen '26Ruuskanen '25Vilotijević '23Campbell '23
72% semantic matchNeuroscience
Dan A Ganea, Alexander Bexter, Mathias Günther+3 more·Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience·Sep 3, 2020· 23 citations