bioRxivEvolutionary BiologyPreprint
Extending the IICR to multiple genomes and identification of limitations of some demographic inferential methods
Lounès ChikhiiD, Willy RodrígueziD, Cyriel Paris, Marine Ha-Shan, Alexane JouniauxiD, Armando ArredondoiD, Camille NoûsiD, Simona GruseaiD, Josué M. CorujoiD, Inês Lourenço, Simon BoitardiD, Olivier MazetiD
Abstract
Reconstructing the demographic history of populations and species is one of the greatest challenges facing population geneticists. [50] introduced, for a sample of size k = 2 haploid genomes, a time- and sample-dependent parameter which they called the IICR (inverse instantaneous coalescence rate). Here we extend their work to larger sample sizes and focus on Tk, the time to the first coalescence event in a haploid sample of size k where k [≥] 2. We define the IICRk as the Inverse Instantaneous Coalescence Rate among k lineages. We show that (i) under a panmictic population [Formula] is equivalent to Ne, (ii) the IICRk can be obtained by either simulating Tk values or by using the Q-matrix approach of [61] and we provide the corresponding Python and R scripts. We then study the properties of the [Formula] under a limited set of n-island and stepping-stone models. We show that (iii) in structured models the [Formula] is dependent on the sample size and on the sampling scheme, even when the genomes are sampled in the same deme. For instance, we find that [Formula] plots for individuals sampled in the same deme will be shifted towards recent times with a lower plateau as k increases. We thus show that (iv) the [Formula] cannot be used to represent "the demographic history" in a general sense, (v) the [Formula] can be estimated from real or simulated genomic data using the PSMC/MSMC methods [44, 65] (vi) the MSMC2 method produces smoother curves that infer something that is not the [Formula], but are close to the [Formula] in the recent past when all samples are obtained from the same deme. Altogether we argue that the PSMC, MSMC and MSMC2 plots are not expected to be identical even when the genomes are sampled from the same deme, that none can be said to represent the "demographic history of populations" and that they should be interpreted with care. We suggest that the PSMC, MSMC and MSMC2 could be used together with the [Formula] to identify the signature of population structure, and to develop new strategies for model choice.
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: chromatin & epigenetic regulation
- approach: statistical model
- approach: simulation
- Citations
- 5
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Inferring number of populations and changes in connectivity under the n-island model
A. Arredondo Soto, B. Mourato, … L. Chikhi·bioRxiv·Sep 3, 2020
- The IICR and the Non-Stationary Structured Coalescent: demographic inference with arbitrary changes in population structure
W. R. Rodriguez, O. Mazet, … L. Chikhi·bioRxiv·Jun 7, 2018
- Extending the IICR to complex non-stationary structured models
Alexane Jouniaux, Armando Arredondo, … Olivier Mazet·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 10, 2026
- Modelling and Inferring Large-scale Demographic Fluctuations in Structured Populations Through Simulations and PSMC-based Methods.
Camille Steux, Ravi Vishwakarma, … Lounès Chikhi·bioRxiv·Jun 22, 2026
- On the importance of being structured: instantaneous coalescence rates and a re-evaluation of human evolution
Olivier Mazet, Willy Rodríguez, … Lounès Chikhi·bioRxiv·Nov 9, 2015
- Performance of Sequential Markovian Coalescence Methods when Populations are Structured
Alba Nieto, Óscar Lao, Stefano Mona·bioRxiv·Oct 9, 2025