Sign in
NeurosciencebioRxiv
Preprint

The Effect of Refractive Blur in the Vividness of Mental Imagery

Tharan Suresh, Anupama Roy, Atif Shaikh, Joanne Lydia Rajkumar, Vivek Mathew, Appaswamy Thirumal Prabhakar

Abstract

BackgroundVisual mental imagery or "seeing with the minds eye" is an everyday phenomenon. Visual mental imagery and visual perception share common neural-networks. Hence deficits that affect the visual perception may also affect visual mental imagery. AimWe aimed to study the effect of refractive blur on the vividness of mental imagery. MethodsSubjects were recruited from volunteers and divided into two groups; individuals with refractive errors-Ametropes(AM), and individuals without refractive errors - Emmetropes(EM). After filling in the Verbalizer-Visualizer-Questionnaire (VVQ), the subjects were asked to perform a mental imagery task with and without refractive blur. The participants were asked to generate a mental image of a specific object initially with eyes closed, eyes open and then with refractive blur in random order, and then judge the vividness of the mental image on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (low vividness) to 5 (good vividness). The EM participants had to wear a + 2D spectacles to produce refractive blur. ResultsA total of 162 participants were recruited to the study. Of these 73 were EM and 89 were AM. Of the AM, 30 had additional astigmatism. The mean VVQ score was 64.9(11.2). The mean refractive error was 1.8(1.3)D. Following the mental imagery task, at baseline with eyes closed, 138 (85.5%)subjects had vivid mental imagery close to visual perception(Likert scale:5). With the opening of the eyes, the vividness dropped by at least 1 point in the Likert scale in 139(85.8%). With the introduction of refractive blur, 153(94.4%) subjects had a drop in the vividness of the image by at least 1 point and 22(13.6%) subjects by at least 2 points. ConclusionIntroduction of refractory blur results in the reduction of the vividness of mental imagery.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISSchwarzkopf '26Silvanto '24Bouyer '25Kronemer '24Zhao '25Cabbai '24
78% semantic matchNeuroscience
Dietrich Samuel Schwarzkopf, Xinran Amelia Yu, Ecem Altan+4 more·Royal Society Open Science·Mar 25, 2026· 3 citations