Neural and behavioral catalysts of ongoing memory retrieval
Matthew R. DoughertyiD, Anuya PatiliD, Katherine D. DuncaniD
Abstract
Memory retrieval is notoriously variable. Various neurocognitive states have been theorized to affect retrieval success from moment to moment, but the presence and catalysts of these states in the human brain remain largely understudied. Building on previous work, we studied how recent memory judgments during an ongoing retrieval task (i.e. retrieval judgments vs. novelty detection) and their corresponding neural activity prepare the brain to reinstate unrelated memories during upcoming trials. High-level ventral stream regions, including the hippocampus, reinstated memories with significantly greater fidelity following recent retrieval judgments compared to novelty detection. Activity in dopaminergic nuclei rose during retrieval judgments, which predicted and partially mediated the effect of retrieval judgments on upcoming reinstatement. While dopaminergic nuclei activity predicted upcoming reinstatement, it did not predict upcoming retrieval accuracy. Exploratory analyses revealed the opposite effect in the dorsal and lateral prefrontal cortex, whose activity predicted upcoming retrieval accuracy, but not reinstatement. These results point to distinct neural contributions to what is reinstated and how it may guide memory decisions, and by identifying dopaminergic nuclei as partial mediators of reinstatement, our results open new avenues for investigating how neuromodulatory states may dynamically shape memory accessibility. Significance StatementWhy can we effortlessly recall memories in some moments but struggle at others? Here, we draw on computational models to uncover why human brains are sometimes better prepared to remember and how to nudge them into that state. We discover that recent retrieval judgments, compared to recent novelty detection, increase upcoming accuracy and neural reinstatement of unrelated memories. This effect is so powerful that key memory regions only show reinstatement following preceding retrieval judgments. We found that dopaminergic nuclei are more active during retrieval judgments and predict upcoming memory reinstatement. This pattern partially explains why engaging in remembering prepares your brain to reinstate other memories and reveals new insights for the role dopaminergic nuclei may play in retrieval.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Post-retrieval noradrenergic activation impairs subsequent memory depending on cortico-hippocampal reactivation
Hendrik Heinbockel, Gregor Leicht, … Lars Schwabe·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jan 29, 2025
- The hidden phase of memory: EEG signatures of reactivation during post-retrieval rest
Luz Bavassi, Germán Campos-Arteaga, … Eugenia Pedreira·bioRxiv·Nov 3, 2025
- Successful retrieval is its own reward
Devyn E. Smith, Nicole M. Long·bioRxiv·Jul 26, 2024
- Neural Correlates of Reactivation and Vividness Reveal Separable Contributions to Objective and Subjective Measures of Episodic Memory
Ryan Matthew Barker, Marie St‐Laurent, Bradley R. Buchsbaum·bioRxiv·Mar 11, 2021
- Dopamine is a double-edged sword: Enhancing memory retrieval performance at the expense of metacognition
Mareike Clos, Nico Bunzeck, Tobias Sommer·bioRxiv·Mar 2, 2018
- Probing the neural dynamics of mnemonic representations after the initial consolidation
Wei Liu, Nils Kohn, Guillén Fernández·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jul 30, 2020