Non-uniform genetic effect sizes of variants associated with refractive error suggests gene-gene or gene-environment interactions are pervasive

Abstract

Refractive error is a complex ocular trait controlled by genetic and environmental factors. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified approximately 150 genetic variants associated with refractive error. Among the known environmental factors, education, near-work and time spent outdoors have been demonstrated to have the strongest associations. Currently, the extent of gene-environment or gene-gene interactions in myopia is unknown. Here we show that the majority of genetic variants associated with refractive error show evidence of effect size heterogeneity, which is a hallmark feature of genetic interactions. Using conditional quantile regression, we observed that 88% of genetic variants associated with refractive error have at least nominally-significant non-uniform, non-linear profiles across the refractive error distribution. SNP effects tend to be strongest at the phenotype extremes and have weaker effects in emmetropes. A parsimonious explanation for these findings is that gene-environment or gene-gene interactions in refractive error are pervasive.\n\nAuthor summaryThe prevalence of myopia (nearsightedness) in the United States and East Asia has almost doubled in the past 30 years. Such a rapid rise in prevalence cannot be explained by genetics, which implies that environmental (lifestyle) risk factors play a major role. Nevertheless, diverse approaches have suggested that genetics is also important, and indeed approximately 150 distinct genetic risk loci for myopia have been discovered to date. One attractive explanation for the evidence implicating both genes and environment in myopia is gene-environment (GxE) interaction (a difference in genetic effect in individuals exposed to a high vs. low level of an environmental risk factor). Past studies aiming to discover GxE interactions in myopia have met with limited success, perhaps because information on lifestyle exposures during childhood has rarely been available. Here we used an agnostic approach that does not require information about specific lifestyle exposures in order to detect signatures of GxE interaction. We found compelling evidence for widespread genetic interactions in myopia, with 88% of 150 known myopia genetic susceptibility loci showing an interaction signature. These findings suggest that GxE interactions in myopia are pervasive.