Nature Human BehaviourNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Errors of attention adaptively warp spatial cognition
James A. BrissendeniD, Yitong YiniD, Michael VesiaiD, Taraz G. LeeiD
Abstract
Adaptation is the process by which we adjust internal models of the body, world, and mind in response to sensory feedback. While adaptation is studied extensively in the context of motor control, there is limited evidence that cognitive functions such as working memory are subject to the same error-driven adaptive control mechanism. To examine the possibility that internal spatial representations undergo adaptation, we had participants perform a task that interleaved a perceptual discrimination task and a spatial working memory task. Perceptual discrimination trials (85% of trials) presented an initial peripheral cue to exogenously capture attention, immediately followed by a displaced target stimulus. This sequence of events served to repeatedly induce a covert attentional allocation error. Interleaved spatial working memory trials (15% of trials) presented a stimulus at a pseudorandom peripheral location followed by a delay interval. On half of the working memory trials, the stimulus was surreptitiously presented at the same location as the initial attentional cue. We found that as attentional errors accumulated over the course of the experiment, participants spatial recall shifted to counteract the attentional error. The magnitude of this shift was proportional to the number of induced errors. Recall performance rapidly recovered following the offset of error trials. Multiple control experiments ruled out alternative explanations for these results, such as oculomotor confounds and attentional biases unrelated to error. These findings indicate that the computational mechanisms governing the adaptation of motor commands appear to similarly serve to adjust and calibrate spatial cognition.
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Field percentile
- top 41%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Attention defines the context for implicit sensorimotor adaptation
Tianhe Wang, Jialin Li, Richard B. Ivry·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 26, 2025
- Sensory prediction errors, not performance errors, update memories in visuomotor adaptation
Kangwoo Lee, Youngmin Oh, … Nicolas Schweighofer·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2018
- The Spatial Specificity and Recovery from Visual Adaptation in Causality Perception
Laura Van Zantwijk, Martin Rolfs, Sven Ohl·bioRxiv·Apr 9, 2026
- Task errors drive memories that improve sensorimotor adaptation.
Li‐Ann Leow, Welber Marinovic, … Timothy J. Carroll·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 6, 2020
- Does force-field adaptation induce after-effects on space representation?
Carine Michel, Lucie Bonnetain, … Olivier White·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jul 16, 2018
- Converting color memory toward a spatial format to benefit behavior
Amit Rawal, Michael Josef Wolff, Rosanne L. Rademaker·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2026