Current BiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Shared texture-like representations, not global form, underlie deep neural network alignment with human visual processing
Jessica LokeiD, Lynn K. A. SörenseniD, Iris I. A. GroeniD, Natalie L. M. CappaertiD, H. Steven ScholteiD
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.36
- Field percentile
- top 2%
Abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) excel at predicting neural responses across the visual hierarchy 1-5, a success widely interpreted as evidence of shared object recognition computations 6,7. Yet improving DNN object recognition accuracy does not reliably increase neural predictivity 8,9, and even untrained networks predict brain responses above chance 9-11. This disconnect suggests that object recognition may not drive DNN-brain alignment. Texture-like statistics are represented in both DNNs and mid-level visual cortex 12-17. In natural images, these statistics are carried by objects and backgrounds, shaping representations and recognition in both systems 18-21. Does DNN-brain alignment reflect shared sensitivity to object-related information or texture-like statistics? To dissociate these factors, we recorded EEG from 57 participants viewing natural scenes, texture-synthesized images preserving local statistics while disrupting global form and object-only images with backgrounds removed. If alignment reflects texture-like statistics, it should peak for texture-synthesized images. If it reflects object-related processing, alignment should be strongest for natural and object-only conditions, which preserve object information. We compared EEG responses with DNN activations via weighted representational similarity analysis 22,23. Texture-synthesized images yielded the strongest DNN-EEG alignment, peaking in early responses (<200 ms) and explaining up to [~]85% of noise-ceiling-normalized explainable variance versus [~]44% for natural and [~]55% for isolated objects. Crucially, object categories were more decodable for natural and object-only images than texture-synthesized images, yet these object-rich conditions showed weaker alignment. This dissociation reveals that DNNs capture the texture-statistical component of early visual responses while failing to explain later, object-related variance. HighlightsO_LITexture-synthesized images yield the strongest DNN-brain alignment across DNNs. C_LIO_LIObject categories decode better from object-rich than texture-synthesized EEG. C_LIO_LIDNN-brain alignment reflects shared texture statistics, not object-related processing. C_LI
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Brain alignment in deep neural networks emerges early and independently of object classification
H. Steven Scholte, Niklas Müller, … Marcel A. J. van Gerven·bioRxiv·Aug 23, 2026
- Systematic image perturbations reveal persistent gaps between human and machine vision
Kato Mugihiko, Biyu Jade He·iSciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 17, 2026
- Human visual cortex and deep convolutional neural network care deeply about object background
Jessica Loke, Noor Seijdel, … H. Steven Scholte·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- Deep neural networks and visuo-semantic models explain complementary components of human ventral-stream representational dynamics
Kamila Maria Jozwik, Tim Christian Kietzmann, … Marieke Mur·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 9, 2023
- Characterizing the temporal dynamics of object recognition by deep neural networks: role of depth
Kandan Ramakrishnan, Iris I. A. Groen, … S. Ghebreab·bioRxiv·Sep 10, 2017
- Diverse deep neural networks all predict human IT well, after training and fitting
Katherine R. Storrs, Tim Christian Kietzmann, … Nikolaus Kriegeskorte·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 17, 2021