GeneticsEvolutionary BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Determinants of mutation load in birds
Abstract
Many mutations have detrimental effects. The mutation load in a population depends on the efficacy of purifying selection in removing deleterious genetic variation. Here, we estimated the proportion of deleterious mutations segregating in 24 population samples of 19 bird species. Exploiting the conserved avian karyotype with high variation in recombination rate and GC content, we quantified the joint effects of effective population size (Ne), recombination (r) and GC-biased gene-conversion (gBGC). In agreement with the nearly-neutral theory of molecular evolution, mutation load was substantially higher in populations with small Ne. Purging efficacy increased with recombination rate resulting in more than a two-fold difference of genetic load between large and small chromosomes. GC-biased mutations contributed about one third to the pool of deleterious mutations. Their expected accumulation in regions of high recombination was offset by purging efficacy in large, but not small populations. This study provides insight into how the interaction of evolutionary processes shapes mutation load. It suggests that genetic risk factors in small populations are fueled by gBGC and cluster in regions of low recombination. SummaryHarmful genetic mutations can accumulate in populations, affecting individual-and population-level health. The authors analyzed genomic data of 24 populations of 19 bird species to understand the evolutionary determinants of such mutation load. They confirm that small populations tend to experience a heavier mutation burden. Moreover, deleterious mutations accumulate more readily in regions of low recombination and are further elevated by GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC), which is offset by purging efficacy in large, but not in small populations. This study suggests that genetic risk factors in small populations are fueled by gBGC and cluster in regions of low recombination.
- organism: multiple species
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: chromatin & epigenetic regulation
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.91
- Field percentile
- top 4%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Estimates of genetic load suggest frequent purging of deleterious alleles in small populations
Tom van der Valk, Marc de Manuel, … Tomàs Marquès‐Bonet·bioRxiv·Apr 22, 2021
- The effective population size modulates the strength of GC biased gene conversion in two passerines
Henry J Barton, Kai Zeng·bioRxiv·Apr 20, 2021
- Population size determines the type of nucleotide variations in humans
Sankar Subramanian·bioRxiv·Apr 24, 2017
- Sexual selection purges mutation load, but not overall genetic diversity in populations, decreasing vulnerability to extinction
Michael D. Pointer, Will J. Nash, … David S. Richardson·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Sep 8, 2026
- The evolution of GC-biased gene conversion by means of natural selection
Augustin Clessin, Julien Joseph, Nicolas Lartillot·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 13, 2025
- Evolution of Drift Robustness in Small Populations