Disambiguating the role of blood flow and global signal with Partial Information Decomposition
Nigel ColenbieriD, Frederik Van de SteeniD, Lucina Q. UddiniD, Russell Alan PoldrackiD, Vince D. CalhouniD, Daniele MarinazzoiD
Abstract
In resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) a common strategy to reduce the impact of physiological noise and other artifacts on the data is to regress out the global signal using global signal regression (GSR). Yet, GSR is one of the most controversial preprocessing techniques for rs-fMRI. It effectively removes non-neuronal artifacts, but at the same time it alters correlational patterns in unpredicted ways. Furthermore the global signal includes neural BOLD signal by construction, and is consequently related to neural and behavioral function. Performing GSR taking into account the underlying physiology (mainly the blood arrival time) has been proved to be beneficial. From these observations we aimed to: 1) characterize the effect of GSR on network-level functional connectivity in a large dataset; 2) assess the complementary role of global signal and vessels; and 3) use the framework of partial information decomposition to further look into the joint dynamics of the global signal and vessels, and their respective influence on the dynamics of cortical areas. We observe that GSR affects intrinsic connectivity networks in the connectome in a non-uniform way. Furthermore, by estimating the predictive information of blood flow and the global signal using partial information decomposition, we observe that both signals are present in different amounts across intrinsic connectivity networks. Simulations showed that differences in blood arrival time can largely explain this phenomenon. With these results we confirm network-specific effects of GSR and the importance of taking blood flow into account for improve denoising methods. Using GSR but not correcting for blood flow might selectively introduce physiological artifacts across intrinsic connectivity networks that distort the functional connectivity estimates.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 39
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Field percentile
- top 8%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Global signal regression reduces connectivity patterns related to physiological signals and does not alter EEG-derived connectivity
Alba Xifra‐Porxas, Michalis Kassinopoulos, … Georgios D. Mitsis·Frontiers in NeuroimagingPeer-reviewed·Dec 12, 2025
- Identifying and removing widespread signal deflections from fMRI data: Rethinking the global signal regression problem.
Kevin M. Aquino, Ben Fulcher, … Alex Fornito·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Feb 18, 2020
- The effect of global signal regression on DCM estimates of noise and effective connectivity from resting state fMRI
Hannes Almgren, Frederik Van de Steen, … Daniele Marinazzo·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Dec 6, 2019
- Global Signal Removal (GSR) as graph spatial filtering
Fahimeh Arab, Benjamin Snow Sipes, … Ashish Raj·bioRxiv·Apr 9, 2026
- Spatiotemporal empirical mode decomposition of resting-state fMRI signals: application to global signal regression
Narges Moradi, Mehdy Dousty, Roberto Carlos Sotero·Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 23, 2019
- Global Signal Regression Strengthens Association between Resting-State Functional Connectivity and Behavior
Jingwei Li, Ru Kong, … B.T. Thomas Yeo·bioRxiv·Feb 13, 2019