Ring attractor dynamics emerge from a spiking model of the entire protocerebral bridge
Abstract
Animal navigation is accomplished by a combination of landmark-following and dead reckoning based on estimates of self motion. Both of these approaches require the encoding of heading information, which can be represented as an allocentric or egocentric azimuthal angle. Recently, Ca2+ correlates of landmark position and heading direction, in egocentric coordinates, were observed in the ellipsoid body (EB), a ring-shaped processing unit in the fly central complex (Seelig and Jayaraman, 2015). These correlates displayed key dynamics of so-called ring attractors, namely: 1) responsiveness to the position of external stimuli, 2) persistence in the absence of external stimuli, 3) locking onto a single external stimulus when presented with two competitors, 4) stochastically switching between competitors with low probability, and 5) sliding or jumping between positions when an external stimulus moves. We hypothesized that ring attractor-like activity in the EB arises from reciprocal neuronal connections to a related structure, the protocerebral bridge (PB). Using recent light-microscopy resolution catalogues of neuronal cell types in the PB (Wolff et al., 2015; Lin et al., 2013), we determined a connectivity matrix for the PB-EB circuit. When activity in this network was simulated using a leaky-integrate-and-fire model, we observed patterns of activity that closely resemble the reported Ca2+ phenomena. All qualitative ring attractor behaviors were recapitulated in our model, allowing us to predict failure modes of the PB ring attractor and the circuit dynamic phenotypes of thermogenetic or optogenetic manipulations. Ring attractor dynamics emerged under a wide variety of parameter configurations, even including non-spiking leaky-integrator implementations. This suggests that the ring-attractor computation is a robust output of this circuit, apparently arising from its high-level network properties (topological configuration, local excitation and long-range inhibition) rather than biological nitty gritty.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 88
- FWCI
- 5.61
- Field percentile
- top 3%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The head direction circuit of two insect species
Ioannis Pisokas, Stanley Heinze, Barbara H. Webb·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jul 6, 2020
- Neural dynamics and architecture of the heading direction circuit in a vertebrate brain
Luigi Petrucco, Hagar Lavian, … Rubén Portugues·bioRxiv·Apr 27, 2022
- The neuroanatomical ultrastructure and function of a biological ring attractor
Daniel B. Turner‐Evans, Kristopher Torp Jensen, … Vivek Jayaraman·NeuronPeer-reviewed·Sep 10, 2020
- Deep conservation of head direction circuits in bees, ants and flies
Marcel Ethan Sayre, Valentin Gillet, … Stanley Heinze·bioRxiv·Aug 3, 2026
- From the fly connectome to exact ring attractor dynamics
Tirthabir Biswas A, Angel Stanoev, … James E. Fitzgerald·bioRxiv·Nov 1, 2024
- History-dependent spiking facilitates efficient encoding of polarization angles in neurons of the central complex
Lisa Rother, Anna Stöckl, Keram Pfeiffer·bioRxiv·Jul 25, 2024