Sign in
NeurosciencebioRxiv
Preprint

PHASOR: An Open-Source Pipeline for Hidden Markov Model Analysis of Stimulus-Locked Retinal Multielectrode-Array Population Activity

Mohammed Junaid Shaik, Sichen Chen, Jessie Jin, Darwin Babino

Abstract

Multielectrode-array recordings of the retina reveal neural population activity at cellular resolution, but relating recurring population states to stimulus timing and single-unit responses requires several linked analysis steps. We present PHASOR (Population HMM Analysis of Stimulus-locked Output in the Retina), a pipeline that combines stimulus-clock alignment, Fourier-based response classification, hidden Markov modeling with Chow-Liu tree emissions, model-order selection, and state visualization. We evaluated the workflow with synthetic populations and demonstrated its use in ten ex vivo recordings from three wild-type retinas (two male, one female) and one male rd1 retina, including 2 Hz full-field sinusoidal stimulation. Across ten synthetic datasets containing seven generative states, selected model orders ranged from seven to nine, with a mean of 7.9, matching the generative count exactly in three of the ten datasets. A representative confusion matrix showed a near one-to-one correspondence between generative and decoded states, with a single additional low-occupancy state, illustrating the distinction between recovering temporal structure and recovering the exact state count. In a representative retinal recording, response classes differed in stimulus phase and contrast dependence, and decoded states differed in occupancy, dwell time, and active-unit composition. Recordings during L-AP4 application, without projected stimulation, and in a photoreceptor-degenerate rd1 retina illustrated changes in the resulting population-state descriptions. PHASOR integrates established analysis methods into a reusable workflow for relating stimulus-associated population activity to functional response classes. The selected states provide a descriptive model of population activity; their number and correspondence to biological assemblies require separate validation.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISRule '19Pérez-Orteg '21Ruda '20Hoshal '23O'Donnell '16Phillips '26
60% semantic matchNeuroscience
Michael E. Rule, David Schnoerr, Matthias H. Hennig+1 more·PLoS Computational Biology·Nov 4, 2019· 9 citations