bioRxivEvolutionary BiologyPreprint
Corallimorpharian genome supports the monophyly of Scleractinia and illuminates the cellular evolution of coral calcification
Thomas D. LewiniD, Tosuke SakagamiiD, Victor M. Piñón-González, Yuki YoshiokaiD, Li-Jung Kao, Yi‐Ling Chiu, Kohsei SASAKI, Yi-Hua CheniD, Jeng-Yi LiiD, Kai-Xuan Tin, Mei‐Yeh Jade LuiD, David J. Miller, Shinya ShikinaiD, Mei‐Fang LiniD, Yi‐Jyun LuoiD
- Citations
- 0
Abstract
The production of calcified skeletons by stony corals is the cornerstone of reef ecosystems and the persistence of marine biodiversity. Corallimorpharians, sometimes described as naked corals, resemble stony corals in many respects but lack hardened skeletons. However, whether they are stony corals that secondarily lost their skeletons has been a subject of much debate. Here, we present a chromosome-level genome of the corallimorpharian Ricordea yuma and show that macrosynteny and microsynteny analyses provide strong support for corallimorpharians as the sister group to stony corals. This phylogenetic placement indicates that corallimorpharians were not ancestrally skeletonized and therefore occupy a critical outgroup position for reconstructing the origin of coral calcification. Guided by this phylogenetic context, we sequenced whole-polyp single-cell transcriptomes from R. yuma and the complex coral Galaxea fascicularis and found that the scleractinian skeleton evolved through the emergence of a derived calicoblast cell state in stony corals. A combination of comparative genomics and regeneration experiments in G. fascicularis show that the emergence of the calicoblast cell state was accompanied by the evolution of a biomineralization toolkit assembled from lineage-specific innovations and co-opted ancestral components. Although corallimorpharians retain some ancestral genes later incorporated into coral biomineralization, they lack a detectable calicoblast-like transcriptional state and many core calcification genes. Together, our findings indicate that coral calcification arose through coordinated changes in genome architecture, gene repertoire, and cell identity, highlighting this process as a major evolutionary transition driven by the integration of genomic and cellular innovations.
- organism: non-human primate
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- assay: scRNA-seq
- research focus: phylogenetics / evolution
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genetic parallels in biomineralization of the calcareous sponge Sycon ciliatum and stony corals
Oliver Voigt, Magdalena V. Wilde, … Gert Wörheide·eLifePeer-reviewed·Sep 9, 2025
- New non-bilaterian transcriptomes provide novel insights into the evolution of coral skeletomes
N. Conci, G. Woerheide, S. Vargas·bioRxiv·Mar 31, 2019
- The calcifying interface in a stony coral's primary polyp: An interplay between seawater and an extracellular calcifying space
Gal Mor Khalifa, Shani Levy, Tali Mass·Journal of Structural BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 22, 2021
- Comparative analysis of the genomes of Stylophora pistillata and Acropora digitifera provides evidence for extensive differences between species of corals
Christian Robert Voolstra, Yong Li, … Manuel Aranda·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Dec 8, 2017
- Full-length transcriptome maps of reef-building coral illuminate the molecular basis of calcification, symbiosis, and circadian genes
- Comparative proteomics of octocoral and scleractinian skeletomes and the evolution of coral calcification
N. Conci, M. Lehmann, … G. Woerheide·bioRxiv·Dec 30, 2019