A benchmarking of human Y-chromosomal haplogroup classifiers from whole-genome and whole-exome sequence data
Víctor García‐OlivaresiD, Adrián Muñoz‐BarreraiD, Luis A. Rubio‐RodrígueziD, David JáspeziD, Ana Díaz-de UseraiD, Antonio Íñigo-CamposiD, Krishna R. VeeramahiD, Santos AlonsoiD, Mark ThomasiD, Jose Miguel Lorenzo-SalazariD, Rafaela González‐MontelongoiD, Carlos FloresiD
Abstract
The non-recombinant region of the Y chromosome (NRY) contains a great number of polymorphic markers that allows to accurately reconstruct pedigree relationships and retrieve ancestral information from study samples. The analysis of NRY is typically implemented in anthropological, medical, and forensic studies. High-throughput sequencing (HTS) has profoundly increased the identification of genetic markers in the NRY genealogy and has prompted the development of automated NRY haplogroup classification tools. Here, we present a benchmarking study of five command-line tools for NRY haplogroup classification. The evaluation was done using empirical short-read HTS data from 50 unrelated donors using paired data from whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and whole-exome sequencing (WES) experiments. Besides, we evaluate the performance of the top-ranked tool in the classification of data of third generation HTS obtained from a subset of donors. Our findings demonstrate that WES can be an efficient approach to infer the NRY haplogroup, albeit generally providing a lower level of genealogical resolution than that recovered by WGS. Among the tools evaluated, YLeaf offers the best performance for both WGS and WES applications. Finally, we demonstrate that YLeaf is able to correctly classify all samples sequenced with nanopore technology from long noisy reads.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- yallHap: Modern Y-chromosome haplogroup inference with probabilistic scoring and ancient DNA support
Alaina Hardie·bioRxiv·Jan 1, 2026
- ybyra: Y-chromosome haplogroup calling using a tree-based scoring method
Thomaz Pinotti, Hugh McColl, … Lucas Czech·bioRxiv·Nov 20, 2025
- Identifying Y-chromosome haplogroups in arbitrarily large samples of sequenced or genotyped men
G. David Poznik·bioRxiv·Nov 19, 2016
- A benchmarking of human mitochondrial DNA haplogroup classifiers from whole-genome and whole-exome sequence data
Víctor García‐Olivares, Adrián Muñoz‐Barrera, … Carlos Flores·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Oct 15, 2021
- SNAPPY: Single Nucleotide Assignment of Phylogenetic Parameters on the Y chromosome
Alissa L. Severson, Jonathan Shortt, … Christopher R. Gignoux·bioRxiv·Oct 29, 2018
- YHP: Y-chromosome Haplogroup Predictor for predicting male lineages based on Y-STRs
Mengyuan Song, Yuxiang Zhou, … Yiping Hou·Forensic Science InternationalPeer-reviewed·Jun 18, 2024