Bayesian adaptive stimulus selection for dissociating models of psychophysical data
James R. H. CookeiD, Luc P. J. SeleniD, Robert J. van BeersiD, W. Pieter MedendorpiD
Abstract
Comparing models facilitates testing different hypotheses regarding the computational basis of perception and action. Effective model comparison requires stimuli for which models make different predictions. Typically, experiments use a predetermined set of stimuli or sample stimuli randomly. Both methods have limitations; a predetermined set may not contain stimuli that dissociate the models whereas random sampling may be inefficient. To overcome these limitations, we expanded the psi-algorithm (Kontsevich & Tyler, 1999) from estimating the parameters of a psychometric curve to distinguishing models. To test our algorithm, we applied it to two distinct problems. First, we investigated dissociating sensory noise models. We simulated ideal observers with different noise models performing a 2-afc task. Stimuli were selected randomly or using our algorithm. We found using our algorithm improved the accuracy of model comparison. We also validated the algorithm in subjects by inferring which noise model underlies speed perception. Our algorithm converged quickly to the model previously proposed (Stocker & Simoncelli, 2006), whereas if stimuli were selected randomly model probabilities separated slower and sometimes supported alternative models. Second, we applied our algorithm to a different problem; comparing models of target selection under body acceleration. Previous work found target choice preference is modulated by whole body acceleration (Rincon-Gonzalez et al., 2016). However, the effect is subtle making model comparison difficult. We show that selecting stimuli adaptively could have led to stronger conclusions in model comparison. We conclude that our technique is more efficient and more reliable than current methods of stimulus selection for dissociating models.\n\nData AvailabilityAll data and code will be posted on our institutional repository system following acceptance. In the meantime feel free to contact the authors if you would like any of the code.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 1.04
- Field percentile
- top 25%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Adaptive stimulus selection for multi-alternative psychometric functions with lapses
J. H. Bak, J. W. Pillow·bioRxiv·Jun 21, 2018
- Model-optimized stimulus distortions for adaptive estimation of individual sensory representations
Josue Casco-Rodriguez, Fangfang Hong, … David Lipshutz·bioRxiv·Jul 8, 2026
- Stimulus prior and reward probability differentially affect response bias in perceptual decision making
Christina Koß, Jan‐Hendrik Blanke, … Maik Christopher Stüttgen·bioRxiv·Feb 17, 2026
- Choice-induced biases in perception
Long Luu, Alan A Stocker·bioRxiv·Apr 1, 2016
- Influence of Reinforcement and Its Omission on Trial-by-Trial Changes of Response Bias in Perceptual Decision-Making
M. C. Stuettgen, A. Dietl, … F. Jaekel·Journal of the Experimental Analysis of BehaviorPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2024
- Stimulus uncertainty and relative reward rates determine adaptive responding in perceptual decision-making
Luis de la Cuesta‐Ferrer, Christina Koß, … Maik Christopher Stüttgen·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 27, 2025