Nucleic Acids ResearchGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Exome-wide benchmark of difficult-to-sequence regions using short-read next-generation DNA sequencing
Atsushi HijikataiD, Mikita SuyamaiD, Shingo KikugawaiD, Ryo MatobaiD, Takuya NarutoiD, Yumi EnomotoiD, Kenji KurosawaiD, Naoki HaradaiD, Kumiko YanagiiD, Tadashi KanameiD, Keisuke MiyakoiD, Masaki Takazawa, Hideo SasaiiD, Junichi HosokawaiD, Sakae Itoga, Tomomi YamaguchiiD, Tomoki KoshoiD, Keiko MatsubaraiD, Yoko Kuroki, Maki FukamiiD, Kaori AdachiiD, Eiji NanbaiD, Naomi TsuchidaiD, Yuri UchiyamaiD, Naomichi MatsumotoiD, , Osamu OharaiD
Abstract
Next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS) in short-read mode has been recently used for genetic testing in various clinical settings. NGS data accuracy is crucial in clinical settings, and several reports regarding quality control of NGS data, focusing mostly on establishing NGS sequence read accuracy, have been published thus far. Variant calling is another critical source of NGS errors that remains mostly unexplored despite its established significance. In this study, we used a machine-learning-based method to establish an exome-wide benchmark of difficult-to-sequence regions using 10 genome sequence features on the basis of real-world NGS data accumulated in The Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) of the human reference genome sequence (GRCh38/hg38). We used the obtained metrics, designated "UNMET score," along with other lines of structural information of the human genome to identify difficult-to-sequence genomic regions using conventional NGS. Thus, the UNMET score could provide appropriate caveats to address potential sequential errors in protein-coding exons of the human reference genome sequence GRCh38/hg38 in clinical sequencing.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 2.32
- Field percentile
- top 10%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Performance comparison: exome-sequencing as a single test replacing Sanger-sequencing
Hila Fridman, Concetta A. Bormans, … Doron M. Behar·Molecular Genetics and GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Mar 11, 2021
- A precision metric for clinical genome sequencing
Rachel L. Goldfeder, Euan A. Ashley·bioRxiv·May 24, 2016
- A Bioinformatics Pipeline for Whole Exome Sequencing: Overview of the Processing and Steps from Raw Data to Downstream Analysis
Narendra Kumar Meena, Praveen Mathur, … Prashanth Suravajhala·BIO-PROTOCOLPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2018
- Quality threshold evaluation of Sanger confirmation for results of whole exome sequencing in clinically diagnostic setting
Go Hun Seo, Hyeri Kim, … Jungsul Lee·bioRxiv·Dec 8, 2020
- Quantitative Optimization of Sensitivity and Specificity in Targeted and Whole-Exome Sequencing Using Reference-Standard DNA Mixtures
Youngbeen Moon, Chung Hwan Hong, … Kyeong‐Man Hong·bioRxiv·Jan 27, 2026
- Needlestack: an ultra-sensitive variant caller for multi-sample next generation sequencing data
Tiffany Myriam Delhomme, Patrice Hodonou Avogbe, … Matthieu Foll·NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 20, 2020