Animal group size variation in a minimal attraction-repulsion agent-based model

Abstract

Grouping behaviour of prey animals is thought to be mainly driven by fear of predation and resource scarcity. Fear of predation often leads to small inter-individual distances, while resource scarcity leads to the opposite. Consequently, it is believed that the number of individuals in a group (group size) is an emergent property of the trade-off between acquiring scarce resources and preventing predation. We analysed whether group size can be reliably used as a proxy for this trade-off, using a deterministic attraction-repulsion agent-based model in a homogeneous area. In our model, each individual experiences distancedependent attraction and repulsion to all others in the area, where varying degrees of grouping behaviour emerge from the number and distance of intersections between the attraction and repulsion functions. We show that the coefficient of variation of group size generally lies between 50 and 150%, depending on both animal density and the trade-off between resource scarcity and predation. Given that the variations of group size are already this large in homogeneous and deterministic scenarios, we urge researchers to be cautious in using group size as a proxy for the resources/predation trade-off and consider inter-individual distance as a more direct and potentially more reliable alternative.