Network of small no-take marine reserves reveal greater abundance and body size of fisheries target species
F. A. Rolim, T. Langlois, P. F. C. Rodrigues, T. Bond, F. d. S. Motta, L. M. Neves, O. B. F. Gadig
Abstract
No-take marine reserves (NTRs), i.e. areas with total fishing restrictions, have been established worldwide aiming to provide biodiversity and ecosystem conservation. Brazil has established NTRs, but currently lacks scientific knowledge and understanding of their ecological role, particularly regarding rocky reefs in subtropical regions. Consequently, this study aimed to contrast NTR, from the 30 year old Tupinambas Ecological Station, and comparable fished sites across a coastal biogeographic gradient to investigate the effect of fishing and habitat variability on the abundance and body-size of rocky reef fish. We used Baited Remote Underwater stereo-Video (stereo-BRUVs) and Diver Operated stereo-Video (stereo-DOVs) systems to simultaneously sample reef fish and habitat. Model selection and results identified habitat and biogeographic variables, such as distance from shore, as important predictor variables, explaining several aspects of the fish assemblage. The effect of protection was important in determining the abundance and body-size of targeted species, in particular for epinephelids and carangids. Conversely, species richness was correlated with habitat complexity and not with protection status. This is the first study to publish data using these novel survey methods in the Southeastern Atlantic and demonstrate their utility, in combination with an established network of NTRs, to provide benchmarks for conservation and fisheries management.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Marine reserve benefits and recreational fishing yields: the winners and the losers
M. Kayal, M. Cigala, … M. Verdoit-Jarraya·bioRxiv·Aug 3, 2020
- A meta-analysis examining how fish biodiversity varies with marine protected area size and age
H. A. L. Hollitzer, F. May, S. A. Blowes·EcospherePeer-reviewed·Dec 13, 2023
- Identifying nearshore nursery habitats for sharks in the Eastern Tropical Pacific from fisheries landings and interviews
J. Lopez Angarita, M. Villate, … A. Tilley·bioRxiv·Feb 3, 2021
- Herbivorous fish of Sinai marine protected areas (Gulf of Aqaba): Structure baseline for potential thermal stress impact management
K. M. El-Haddad, A.-H. A. Ali, … T. A. Temraz·bioRxiv·Sep 17, 2021
- The cost of enforcing a marine protected area to achieve ecological targets for the recovery of fish biomass
C. Brown, B. Parker, … E. T. Game·bioRxiv·Aug 27, 2018
- Cascading Effects of Shrimp Trawling: Increased Benthic Biomass and Increase in Net Primary Production
Luczkovich Joseph John, Deehr Rebecca A, … Jeffrey C Johnson·bioRxiv·Apr 10, 2018