bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Dissociable mechanistic contributions of limb and task related errors during human sensorimotor learning
Anushka Oza, Adarsh KumariD, Apoorva Sharma, Pratik K. MuthaiD
- Citations
- 3
Abstract
The unpredictable nature of our world can introduce a variety of errors in our actions, including sensory prediction errors (SPEs) and task performance errors (TPEs). SPEs arise when our existing internal models of limb-environment properties and interactions become miscalibrated due to changes in the environment, while TPEs occur when environmental perturbations hinder achievement of task goals. The precise mechanisms employed by the sensorimotor system to learn from such limb- and task-related errors and improve future performance are not comprehensively understood. To gain insight into these mechanisms, we performed a series of learning experiments wherein the location and size of a reach target were varied, the visual feedback of the motion was clamped along fixed directions, and instructions were carefully manipulated. Our findings indicate that the mechanisms employed to compensate SPEs and TPEs are dissociable. Specifically, our results fail to support theories that suggest that TPEs trigger implicit refinement of reach plans, or that their occurrence automatically modulates SPE-mediated learning. Rather, TPEs drive improved action selection, that is, the selection of verbally-sensitive, volitional strategies that reduce future errors. Moreover, we find that exposure to SPEs is necessary and sufficient to trigger implicit recalibration. When SPE-mediated implicit learning and TPE-driven improved action selection combine, performance gains are larger. However, when actions are always successful and strategies are not employed, refinement in behaviour is smaller. Flexibly weighting strategic action selection and implicit recalibration could thus be a way of controlling how much, and how quickly, we learn from errors.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Motor Learning Driven by Sensory Prediction Errors is Insensitive to Task Performance Feedback
Gaurav Panthi, Pratik K. Mutha·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2026
- Interactions between sensory prediction error and task error during implicit motor learning
Jonathan Sanching Tsay, Adrian Mark Haith, … Hyosub E. Kim·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 23, 2022
- Sensory prediction error drives subconscious motor learning outside of the laboratory
Scott T. Albert, Emily M. Blaum, Daniel H. Blustein·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 12, 2023
- Perceptual prediction error supports implicit process in motor learning.
Xiaoyue Zhang, Wencheng Wu, Kunlin Wei·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2026
- Task errors contribute to implicit remapping in sensorimotor adaptation
Li‐Ann Leow, Welber Marinovic, … Timothy J. Carroll·European Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 19, 2018
- Task errors drive memories that improve sensorimotor adaptation.
Li‐Ann Leow, Welber Marinovic, … Timothy J. Carroll·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 6, 2020